Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 8 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2089 contributions

|

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I assume that the stakeholders will have a full understanding of the complexity and will be comfortable with the fact that you would rather take your time to get a fisheries management plan right than introduce it quickly. Is that fair?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

So, the speed of the plan’s development is less important than the plan’s ability to do its job.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Okay. What is your view, Elaine?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Will you outline the process for agreeing the interpretation of the fisheries objectives in the JFS between the UK Government and the devolved Administrations? Were stakeholders involved in that?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I have a question about how you managed to keep them all thinking in the same way, but that might be a question for another day.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

So, you think that the three devolved nations should have a much bigger say in all of those negotiations. Is that what you are saying?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I was interested in what Elaine Whyte was talking about earlier. It is a hugely complex thing to deal with fishing. I know from a farming point of view that a hill farmer has no relation to an arable farmer on the east coast, and the relationships seem to be 10 times more complicated in fishing. It would appear from Elaine’s evidence—Elaine might wish to come in on this—that there needs to be a much tighter agreement with the devolved Administrations to decide what is happening in their waters. Is that a fair assessment?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

That relates to my next question. The Scottish Government determines what the TAC should be, and the matter is then passed back to the UK secretary of state. I assume that a decision that was made by the Scottish Government would always be adhered to.

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

In the earlier session, we heard evidence from Professor Harrison, who has concerns about the secretary of state having powers to determine fishing opportunities for the whole of the UK. Can you clarify what powers the secretary of state will have in relation to fishing opportunities for stocks that are exclusively within Scottish waters? How will the matter be dealt with in the draft JFS?

Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee

Draft Joint Fisheries Statement

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

You might remember that I was self-isolating when you were before the committee talking about the Clyde box closure at a previous meeting. I missed quite a bit of the evidence that was given. Earlier on, we were talking about engagement with communities and how that must be localised. As, I think, you said, I also do not see how the JFS relates to the point that has been made about the Clyde cod box. You fully accepted that bits of the process went completely wrong. You have taken responsibility for that and you will move on from it.

However, my understanding is that you engaged with and took evidence from relevant communities and changed your position during that process. Does that not answer Rachael Hamilton’s question? You were already in the process of engaging with people. You got it wrong, and you accept that, but you were engaging with them anyway. Is that fair?