The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
In the scenario that Finlay Carson has laid out, would a dog not have to chase and kill that rabbit for it to be an offence? Generally, if a Labrador or a spaniel is flushing, as soon as the bird goes up, their nose will be back on the ground. They will not necessarily chase and kill the bird. If they are flushing, will it be an offence if they do not chase the rabbit?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Thank you.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Can I suggest, just for time purposes, that this may be a question that Sara Shaw should consider?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Okay—that gives us something to think about.
I come to Robbie Kernahan. Is NatureScot content with the exception for environmental benefit, from the perspective of your wildlife management schemes? People can get a licence for up to two years for environmental benefit but, as the bill stands, they will have 14 days in which to control a fox that is killing lambs. What is your perspective on that?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
As I said, I am taking us down a rabbit hole.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 22 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
A lot of the stuff that we have talked about has been based on hunting foxes with dogs, which is where a lot of the controversy has been centred. However, we heard this morning from Sara Shaw and William Telford that the controversy also spreads into other areas. What impact will the scheme have on the wider review of species licensing to which the Scottish Government has committed?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Okay. I have a quick question about licensing. We have had various conversations this morning about the necessity of control. I do not think that there is any dispute—we have all agreed—that foxes, in particular, can be a pest to lambs and various other things. You spoke about exceptions to the exception, but is there not an argument for people having a seasonal ability to control fox numbers, rather than their having to say, “I have a particular problem right now and I need a licence to deal with it”? Is there not an argument for seasonal control rather than the issuing of one-off licences?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Earlier, you talked about how we gauge whether an animal is a “nuisance”—we can use that word if it feels more comfortable for you. Please do not take that in a derogatory way; I do not mean that at all. If you were a sheep farmer, how would you gauge whether a fox is a nuisance to you? How would you gauge that that fox is causing you a problem?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2022
Jim Fairlie
Good morning, Lord Bonomy. Thank you for coming along. I really liked your description of urban foxes being the new Teddy boys—without being denigrating to Teddy boys. That was brilliant.
I am trying to piece together all the stuff that you have been talking about, but I have asked this question from day 1. Is the problem with the legislation not the number of dogs but the number of guns? At the start of your evidence, you asked how the hunters can maintain their sport and allow the fox to be chased while they stay within the law. I cannot understand how they can do that, because, from what I can see, the sport is that the fox gets flushed and then chased so that the riders can ride after it. Pest control is the fox being flushed and shot immediately on sight.
I can see a loophole in the law in that, if there is a 200m distance from the wood or whatever is being flushed, there may be a gun at one end and a gun at the other. The fox may go straight through the middle and everybody else will come in behind it. Surely the law should look at the immediate death of the fox on flushing, rather than the number of dogs that chase it.