The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
Sammie, would you like to come in?
11:00COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
Sorry, Jane. I am going to stick with you, because I am on a thread here. The rest of you can come in in a bit. If the range of symptoms can be distilled down, which areas need to be prioritised in co-ordinating care and help for long Covid sufferers?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
I thank you all for your patience and your determination to be here, which I know is causing some of you some difficulty.
I will try to do the mop-up bit at the end. The other committee members will have heard me talk about this before. I was interested to hear you talking about having complex issues. We know that women going through the menopause have exactly the same problem: they cannot get individual treatment. Whether it is menopause, ME or long Covid, there seems to be an issue in the health service around the need to treat things holistically. I have no idea how we solve that, but I hope that this inquiry will bring the health service and practitioners to the Parliament so that we can have a conversation about how we can improve the situation. We do not have the answers; we ask the questions so that people can come up with the answers.
How do we co-ordinate the support for folk who are suffering from long Covid? How do we bring things together so that we have comfort that what you have been dealing with is being dealt with? I am hearing that none of you feels as though what you are dealing with is being taken seriously.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
Let me push you on that point. In our evidence sessions, we have heard that long Covid has around 200 different symptoms and that someone could have one, 10 or 50 of them. Have you ever thought, “That is what has happened; there is nothing that I can do to change it”? Have you considered that?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
Okay—thank you. Does anyone else want to come in?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
No, thank you very much, Michelle. We will look at the last couple of issues that you have raised as we go through the process.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
Welcome to the committee, Bally.
I know very little about fishing. The sum total of my fishing knowledge comes from a day out on a hand-dived scallop boat. I therefore come to this from a different perspective. It would seem, anecdotally, that a 3-mile limit worked because there were more fish in the past. What is the science behind the basis of the 3-mile limit? If a 3-mile limit were set up, what is the science that tells us the level that we are trying to return the fish stocks to?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
I appreciate that this is a difficult question session for you, Bally. Has there been scientific research into the matter, or is your evidence anecdotal? Is your position that we should close the area off for 10 years to see what happens? What would happen during that period? You have already talked about what happens to the communities that are reliant on fish at the moment. In those 10 years—or whatever period—of closure, you want the fish stocks to increase. What level would the fish stocks recover to? Would you start fishing all over again after that? You would already have displaced other fishing boats out of the system.
I am trying to consider the matter from the point of view of fairness. How do you ensure that what your petition is calling for is fair for everyone in the system?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
Following on from Jenni Minto’s question, is the type of gear that is used in inshore fisheries your biggest issue? You do not specifically mention gear in your petition.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jim Fairlie
I agree that we should close the petition at this stage. The evidence that Bally Philp gave us was tremendous and very detailed, but we have heard only from that petitioner. There will be other people in the fishing community who will want to give as much evidence as he has given. We need to be mindful of the fact that the Government is doing its review, so I think that we should close the petition now and include the issues in the broader picture that we look at later in the parliamentary session.