The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I would like to bring in Nicky Page. You have not had a chance to contribute yet, but you might have a view on that point.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Rona Mackay has a supplementary on that topic.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I am assuming that we are talking about a very small number of applicants and officers.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the 20th meeting in 2024 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning.
Our business is the continuation of our stage 1 evidence on the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Bill. We have two panels of witnesses. We will hear first from the Scottish Police Authority.
I give a warm welcome to Fiona McQueen, who is the vice-chair of the Scottish Police Authority board, Katharina Kasper, who is the chair of the SPA complaints and conduct committee, and Mr Robin Johnston, who is the head of legal at the SPA. I thank them for agreeing to provide evidence to the committee.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow up to 80 minutes for the evidence session.
I invite Fiona McQueen to make some brief opening remarks.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
While we are on the subject of policy, practice and process, and sticking with the PIRC, I note that the bill would allow the PIRC to undertake the preliminary assessment of misconduct allocations against senior officers. The committee has received evidence suggesting that either the PIRC or an independent body should carry out that assessment for complaints against all ranks of officers. As members of the public tend to deal with rank officers, rather than senior officers, do you think that, if that initial assessment proposal were extended to all officers, that might enhance public confidence in the complaints system—which Russell Findlay touched on, albeit in a different context? Perhaps Mr Johnston might like to come in with any thoughts on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, that was really interesting.
Before I bring other members back in, I note that, on the proposal for a statutory code of ethics, some witnesses have questioned what difference a code of ethics will have if there is no sanction for breaching it. I would be very interested in hearing whether you have a view on that and whether such a provision should be considered at stage 2.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Our next panel of witnesses is from Police Scotland. I welcome to the meeting Alan Speirs, the deputy chief constable, professionalism, strategy and engagement; Helen Harrison, chief superintendent and head of the professional standards department; and Nicky Page, head of human resources. Thank you all for providing written evidence to the committee.
I intend to allow about 80 minutes for this evidence session. I will begin with a question that I put to our witnesses from the Scottish Police Authority. Witnesses will probably be aware that we have heard evidence from members of the public who have described what seems to have been an inconsistent and, in some cases, unacceptable standard of response when they made a complaint to Police Scotland about the conduct of officers. In addition, we have heard that, when police officers are the subject of a complaint, the way that they are treated falls short of what is expected. One officer, of whom witnesses will probably be aware of, shared his very distressing story with us.
Police Scotland has a lot of work to do internally on handling complaints; that is important because the majority of complaints are probably dealt with internally. I want to ask about the provisions of the bill and about what is required to improve the system of complaints handling. Is there an internal process whereby learning from complaints handling is used? Is there work to monitor complaints trends and issues that arise from them, and is any measuring done so that action can be taken to make changes and so that you can ultimately intervene in complaints of a type that reoccur? Those questions are about quality assurance and the response when complaints are made internally. I ask DCC Speirs to start.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will now bring in other members.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
We have about 10 minutes left. I invite Fulton MacGregor to ask questions, followed by Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will step outside the bill for a moment. I have become interested in what sort of conduct brings officers to the attention of the PSD or, if it is a higher bar, the PIRC. We understand police assault and other traditional types of allegations. I am thinking more about the issues and challenges that are bearing down on police officers in the 21st century. Are you seeing any shift in the sorts of issues that are impacting police officers and staff compared to, say, 10 years ago?