The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3378 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. My final question on that is about the bill. From the perspective of the conduct and complaints committee, which provisions in the bill will help to strengthen the work that you have outlined?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will now open the session up to members and bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Just for clarification, are you referring to the CAAPD in last week’s evidence session?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I was just about to do that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I have a final question before I bring in other members. The bill is being scrutinised against the backdrop of the previous chief constable’s statement that Police Scotland is “institutionally racist”. Does the bill go far enough in addressing that allegation? Obviously, the bill will not resolve that situation by itself—a lot of other actions will be required—but will the bill make a positive contribution, in light of the previous chief constable’s comments?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
That is very helpful. I have another question, which stays on the subject of recruiting the best candidates possible for what we all know is an extremely difficult job that places huge demands on police officers and staff. It is on vetting, which we have not covered yet.
We are aware that the HMICS assurance review of vetting policy and procedures included a recommendation that the Scottish Government should place legislative requirements on Police Scotland with regard to vetting. The Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs has advised that she is committed to exploring the legislative basis for vetting, particularly in the context of the bill. Is any work already under way in that space? Do you have any additional comments, particularly on the back of the HMICS review?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I will finish with a couple of quick-fire questions. The first is on the proposals for a barred list. In evidence, we have heard some concerns about the proposals for that list to be public. I am interested in your views on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
I know that you have more questions, Mr Findlay, but I will bring in other members at this point and we can perhaps come back to you later.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Audrey Nicoll
The spirit of my question was more about public confidence, which is critical to what we are looking at. I am aware, from some of the helpful data that Police Scotland has provided—I think that it was from Police Scotland rather than the SPA—that a large proportion of complaints are resolved relatively quickly in-house and that it is a relatively small proportion of the overall number of complaints that find their way into the processes that we are discussing.
This is probably a big question but, staying on public confidence, I would be interested to hear your views on which provisions of the bill—for example, on the code of ethics or the strengthening of the duty of candour—are elements that speak to enhancing public confidence.