The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I am sure that we will come on to safe spaces in our follow-up questions. I do not know whether ACC Paton or Chief Superintendent Paden wants to pick up on my general question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I advise members that we have a bit of extra time available, so I propose that we extend the meeting by about 10 minutes. If members want to come back in with questions, we should have some scope to allow that to happen.
11:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I know that you want to ask a follow-up question, Ben, but I will bring in other members and we will come back to you. I ask for fairly succinct questions and responses to allow all our witnesses to come back in.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I found that really fascinating. It is a perspective that I was not sighted on at all, so it was very helpful in laying out some of the context.
Last but not least, I will bring in David Hamilton. David, is there anything that you would like to add?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring the evidence session to a close with a final question, cabinet secretary. It relates to the review of psychiatric emergency plans. I do not think that we touched on it in our previous evidence session, but we are aware from the update that you provided that a review has been going on and that the work was expected to be completed at the end of last year. We hope to see a template and guidance towards the spring of this year.
I highlight a comment that HMICS made in its review into mental health. It outlined that there was “a lack of consistency” in the expectations on the police within different PEPs. It also
“found varying levels of awareness of the PEP among senior officers in local policing divisions.”
Do you have any further comments on the PEP review? Where do you see PEPs fitting into the other work going on at the more strategic level that we discussed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Please be very quick.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I am really sorry but I must draw this session to a close.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I assume that, within that work, issues to do with the arrangements for remote and rural areas are addressed. Is that correct?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is good to hear.
As there are no more questions, I bring the evidence session to a close. I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for joining us. It has been helpful.
Next Wednesday, we will hear from the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner on her work over the past year.
12:39 Meeting continued in private until 12:49.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Audrey Nicoll
Finally, are members content to delegate responsibility to me to approve a short factual report to the Parliament on the affirmative instrument?
Members indicated agreement.