The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3610 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you—that is very helpful. As no one else wants to come in, I will bring in Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Right. The TOM supports that delivery.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is really helpful, thank you for that. I will bring in Pauline McNeill for a follow-up question on that point and will then bring in Liam Kerr.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
Coming back to the Prison Service’s alcohol and drug recovery strategy, I am interested in whether you feel that the alcohol aspect of that strategy sufficiently addresses the issues that we have been talking about. Should alcohol harm be the subject of, say, a separate approach? Are the policies and guidance that are already in place—as we know, there are a lot of them—translating into consistent practice? We might have touched on that already in relation to consistency and sustainability of services. Moreover, is there sufficient understanding among, expertise in and training for the health professionals who are dealing with and supporting the cohort of the prison population impacted by alcohol harm?
I have asked a few questions there, but I am just interested in finding out how well the strategy is working. Craig, do you want to come in first?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is an interesting response.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I think that Hamish Robertson wants to interject.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
You have helpfully highlighted the physical and practical challenges of the release process itself—thank you.
I will draw this part of the session to a close, as none of witnesses want to make a final comment. There is always lots that we do not have time to cover, but I thank you all very much for your attendance today. You have given us lots to think about as we begin to shape our report.
I will suspend the meeting for five minutes to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:03 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We move on to our second panel of the morning. I am pleased to welcome Dr Craig Sayers, clinical lead for prison healthcare at NHS Forth Valley and for the national prison care network; Dr Lesley Graham, a retired public health doctor and founding member of Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems; and Dr Catriona Connell from the University of Stirling. Welcome to you all, and thank you very much for your attendance. Thank you also to those witnesses who have provided written submissions.
We are looking to spend around 80 minutes on this evidence session. I will get things going with my usual opening question. I will perhaps come to Dr Sayers first, and I will then move across to Dr Graham and Dr Connell.
We have heard a lot of evidence throughout this inquiry, and we are keenly aware that the primary focus of our evidence has been on the use of drugs in prisons. It has been less to do with the use of alcohol or some other complex issues around co-dependency, the use of alcohol and its impact, particularly in the justice system. Could you perhaps set the scene by setting out whether illicit alcohol in prisons is indeed an issue in Scotland? Is there adequate and consistent screening, and is there early identification of alcohol use disorders at admission? What support and service provision is available in prisons and, more broadly, in the community?
That is quite a big question. I will bring in Dr Sayers first to kick things off.
11:15Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for those helpful opening remarks. What you seem to be saying is that it is not so much about the illicit use of alcohol in prisons; the focus needs to be on the management of individuals who have been impacted by alcohol use, and on making effective interventions and supporting them while they are in prison and, I presume, after release.