The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3440 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Before we move into private session, I remind members that our next meeting will be on Wednesday 21 May and our main item of business will be to hear from a public petitioner, alongside other witnesses, on the issue of making non-fatal strangulation a standalone criminal offence in Scotland.
12:27 Meeting continued in private until 12:56.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Rona Mackay, do you want to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. There was a lot in there.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Would Nicola Taylor like to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Nicola, would you like to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We have a little bit of time in hand, so I will come in with a couple of questions on issues that we have already touched on. I am happy for other members to come in with final questions, too.
11:45My question is about European Union co-operation. Coincidentally, last month, the committee heard evidence from academics on criminal justice co-operation with the European Union. We were told that access to the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity would be
“relevant to co-ordinating cybersecurity positions and highlighting new cybersecurity threats that have emerged.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 30 April 2025; c 7.]
Is the loss of access to Europol or the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity and to their databases impacting on or hampering our effectiveness in the UK in tackling cybercrime? Given that we are in the middle of the trade and co-operation agreement review, should anything be raised or discussed to address gaps in criminal justice co-operation, particularly in the cybercrime space that we have been discussing?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
On that note, I will bring in ACC Houston from Police Scotland to cover the enforcement role of Police Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I suggest that we bring Nicola Taylor in before we go to Liam Kerr.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Adam Stachura, who has been listening patiently to what we have been discussing. I am very interested in your organisation’s perspective on the importance of support in the aftermath of a crime.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is consideration of the correspondence that we received on 29 April 2025 from the Minister for Children, Young People and The Promise, Natalie Don-Innes MSP.
The letter provided an update on the Scottish Government’s work to restore secure care accommodation capacity for young people in Scotland. I refer members to paper 3, which contains the letter. We will discuss our views on what action, if any, we want to take in response to it.
Does any member want to come in with comments or observations on the correspondence?