The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
On that point, if we are learning lessons for the future, data is quite important. Can you comment on how we integrate the collection of data into the review process so that that can inform future policy and direction?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Professor Websdale, do you have any views on the process’s structure in regard to the oversight committee and panel proposals?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Can I come in there, in the interests of time? I know that this is an issue that you are very keen to drill down on, but perhaps the witnesses could follow up with a written—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will go straight to Emma Forbes for some general comments.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I think that Sharon Dowey would like to follow up on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I am aware that we have run over our time a little, but it has been important to let this part of the meeting run.
I have a couple of final questions about part 2 of the bill, which would allow reviews to be carried out in parallel with other proceedings, namely criminal ones. However, the Lord Advocate would have the power to pause or end a review process to prevent other proceedings from being prejudiced. I am interested in hearing the views of Laura Buchan and Emma Forbes on that provision.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is great.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies this morning.
Our first item of business is to continue our stage 1 scrutiny of the Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill. We have a good panel of witnesses. I am pleased to welcome Laura Buchan, from the policy and engagement division of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, and Dr Emma Forbes, the national lead for domestic abuse for the Crown Office; Malcolm Graham, the chief executive of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service; and Superintendent Richard Thomas and Detective Superintendent Adam Brown from Police Scotland. I offer a warm welcome to you all. Thank you for taking the time to attend today’s meeting and for your submissions, which have been very helpful.
I intend to allow about 75 minutes for this session. I refer members to papers 1 and 2. To get the session under way, I will start with a pretty broad question that focuses on part 1 of the bill. I propose to bring in Laura Buchan first, followed by Malcolm Graham and Superintendent Richard Thomas.
Part 1 of the bill makes a range of changes to the procedures in criminal courts. In order for the committee to get a sense of your overall views of the proposals, could you briefly outline any provisions in part 1 in relation to which you have any issues or concern? When we started our evidence taking last week, issues came up relating to resourcing and the practical implications of the provisions.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Do you want to come in with a supplementary question, Ben Macpherson, or not quite yet?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will therefore bring in Pauline McNeill now, followed by Ben Macpherson.