The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
There will be a division.
For
Dowey, Sharon (South Scotland) (Con)
Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP))
Abstentions
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I call Russell Findlay to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 78.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That takes us to the next group. Given that it is spot on 11 o’clock, I propose that we have a short suspension of around 10 minutes to allow for a comfort break.
11:00 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will draw proceedings to a close, but I want to say a couple of things before I do so. I am conscious that group 10, which we had hoped to get to today, contains several very important amendments of great interest to victims. Maggie Chapman and Pam Gosal were here to speak to the amendments, but I do not want to curtail our ability to have a good debate on those important issues.
As this has already been quite a long meeting, I propose to finish at this point this morning. We will begin next week’s meeting with the group on non-harassment orders, and Pam Gosal and Maggie Chapman will join us then. I hope that members are content with that proposal.
We will pause stage 2 proceedings at this point and resume consideration of amendments at our next meeting on Wednesday, 19 March. I thank the cabinet secretary, the minister and their officials for attending this morning.
Meeting closed at 13:21.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
It is helpful to confirm that point.
I am aware of the time and will finish up with a couple of questions. The first is about part 3 of the bill, which deals with special measures. I know that we touched on those earlier. My second question relates to a separate but interconnected issue that was raised during the stage 1 evidence and on which I would welcome the cabinet secretary’s response, which is the pilot of free court transcripts.
First, I come back to the special measures in civil cases. Will you give us a broad commentary on the thinking behind the proposed amendments to those provisions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We need to change officials, so just bear with me.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is no problem.
As there are no more questions on part 4, we will have a short suspension to allow for a changeover of officials.
10:55 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
A very good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies.
Our first item of business is evidence from the Scottish Government on its plans to amend the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill before we begin consideration of amendments to the bill at stage 2 on 12 March.
I am pleased that we are joined this morning by Angela Constance, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs, and Scottish Government officials, including Heather Reece Wells and Lisa McCloy from the criminal justice reform unit and Nicola Guild from the legal directorate. Welcome to you all. Throughout the morning, as our discussion moves between different parts of the bill, the officials supporting the cabinet secretary will change, so we might need to have a couple of brief suspensions to allow that to happen. Thank you all for taking the time to attend the meeting.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow about 90 minutes for the session. I will structure questioning by focusing on part 4 of the bill first, then parts 5 and 6 and, finally, parts 1 to 3. I invite the cabinet secretary to make some opening remarks.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will bring in Rona Mackay before we move on.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
As there are no more questions on parts 4, 5 and 6, we will move on to parts 1 to 3.
I am aware of the time. Cabinet secretary, can you confirm that you can stay on for a little bit longer to answer questions on parts 1 to 3?