The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
That is really interesting—and a bit concerning when it comes to the backlog issues that you have highlighted.
From what you have said, one of the challenges involves recruitment, which is something that we have been conscious of. I will touch on that briefly. What do you see as some of the priorities in addressing that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I would quite like to move things on, thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I would like the session to run on a little bit to 11.40, so we have about seven minutes left. We will bring things to a close by looking at aspects of reform and different models for change.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I am afraid that time is against us. Mr Moir would like to come in, after which we will close this part of the meeting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
That is helpful and will be noted.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I am happy with that. Does anybody want to raise any other points?
I suggest that we ask for an update from the Scottish Government on its plans and whether it intends to take forward any of the Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee’s recommendations that fall within the criminal justice remit. Are members happy with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I agree with the comments that have been made, so I will not repeat them. Does Mr MacGregor wish to add anything?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
For clarity and to recap, the SSI has been laid under the negative procedure, which means that there is no requirement for us to endorse the SSI or vote for it to come into force. The SSI will come into force unless Parliament agrees a motion to annul.
However, we have shared some concerns about the provisions in the SSI. I suggest that the minute of the meeting states that the committee makes no recommendation on the SSI but notes that some committee members have expressed concerns about certain provisions of the SSI and notes that those concerns are set out in the public record in the Official Report of the meeting.
Are members content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. Thank you very much.
In light of our discussion, I propose that we write in due course to the cabinet secretary and the Scottish Prison Service to raise additional points, and that we invite the cabinet secretary back to provide further updates on the situation in relation to the provisions of the SSI.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
The next agenda item is a round-table discussion on legal aid and legal aid reform. I refer members to papers 2 and 3. We will take evidence from a round table of witnesses, who will join us virtually due to social distancing rules at Holyrood.
I welcome our witnesses: Gillian Fyfe, strategic lead for strong communities, Citizens Advice Scotland; Tony Lenehen, president of the Faculty of Advocates criminal bar association; Ian Moir, legal aid convener for the Law Society of Scotland; David Fraser, executive director of court operations at the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service; Colin Lancaster, chief executive of the Scottish Legal Aid Board; Julia McPartlin, president of the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association; Professor Alan Paterson, professor of law at the University of Strathclyde; and Dr Marsha Scott, chief executive of Scottish Women’s Aid. We appreciate the time that they have taken to join us, and I thank the witnesses who have provided written submissions. Those are available online.
I intend to allow an hour and 20 minutes for questions and discussion. I ask members to indicate which witness they are directing their remarks to, then we can open the floor to other witnesses for comments. If other witnesses wish to respond, I ask them to indicate that by typing R in the chat function on BlueJeans and I will bring them in if time permits. If they are merely agreeing with a point that has been made, there is no need to intervene to say so. Other comments that witnesses make in the chat function will not be visible to committee members or recorded anywhere, so if a witness wants to make a comment, they should do so by requesting to speak.
We now move on to questions. I ask members and our invited guests keep their questions and comments as succinct as possible to facilitate a free-flowing discussion. I will structure the discussion around a series of broad themes. The first theme is access to justice and the current experiences of users of the legal aid system, and I will direct some opening questions to Professor Alan Paterson and Mr Ian Moir.
Professor Paterson, you had an advisory role in Martyn Evans’s review, which resulted in the report, “Rethinking Legal Aid—an independent strategic review” in 2018. It brought out some key issues about simplifying the system, creating a fair payments system and making the system more accessible. What priorities do you see in the overall theme of accessing legal aid and how can we improve access to criminal justice legal aid?