The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
That would be helpful—thank you.
If there are no more questions on the capital budget side of things, we will move on to look at Covid and the 26th UN climate change conference of the parties—COP26—on which Russell Findlay has some questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Russell Findlay, before coming to Collette Stevenson.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I thank you all for your attendance. It has been a really useful session. If you have any follow-up information that might be helpful to the committee, that would be welcome, and we will obviously take it into account.
We will have a five-minute break before we move on to our next agenda item.
11:35 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I am aware that this is a really important topic and that there are a lot of moving parts at play, but I ask that we try to keep to time so that we can cover as much ground as possible.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Collette Stevenson.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Pauline McNeill is keen to come in.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I ask that you keep your answer as brief as you can, so that I can let other members in before we close the meeting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 6 October 2021
Audrey Nicoll
The next agenda item is consideration of a paper from the clerks on a United Kingdom Parliament bill. I refer members to paper 4. Since we last agreed to publish a short legislative consent report on the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has published a report and has highlighted a couple of issues, which are outlined in the paper. It is suggested that we update our planned report and publish it now.
We should note that the Scottish Government plans to produce a supplementary legislative consent memorandum in due course. We can consider the issue of extraction of information from digital devices then.
Do members agree that we should update our draft report, as is suggested in paper 4, and that we should ask the clerks to make arrangements for publication?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the sixth meeting of the Criminal Justice Committee. No apologies have been received.
The first agenda item is a decision on whether to take in private item 6, which is consideration of today’s evidence. Do we agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Our final item is post-legislative scrutiny of the Control of Dogs (Scotland) Act 2010. I invite the committee to consider a letter that we received from the Public Audit Committee and I refer members to paper 6.
The Public Audit Committee’s predecessor committee carried out post-legislative scrutiny of the Control of Dogs (Scotland) Act 2010 and made a series of recommendations for the Scottish Government. It appeared to be frustrated with the pace of the Scottish Government’s response. The session 6 Public Audit Committee has brought the issue to the attention of a number of parliamentary committees, including us. We might want to consider whether there is any merit in repeating the post-legislative scrutiny exercise that was carried out by the session 5 Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee.
Does anybody want to raise any queries?