The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3378 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Katy, I wonder whether I could come in here.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I am sorry to cut you off, but there a couple of other areas for questioning that I would like to get to before we close the session at 10 minutes to 12. I want to ask a couple of questions about independent legal representation, which I think that you covered in your opening statement, cabinet secretary. In the testimony that we took in private from survivors, many of them said that they felt that their voice was not heard in court, whereas they felt that the voice of the accused was heard. Of course, section 275 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 means that particularly intimate and sensitive information about a complainer can be used in the court. What are your views on access to legal representation for victims of sexual assault? Could that be extended to domestic abuse victims?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is consideration of legislative consent memoranda on the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill and the Judicial Review and Courts Bill. I am pleased to welcome back the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans. He is joined by the Scottish Government officials Phil Lamont, who is from the criminal justice division, and Ms Alison Morris, who is head of serious organised crime policy—divert and deter. I refer members to papers 3 and 4.
I invite the cabinet secretary to make some brief opening remarks on the LCM on the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, after which we will move to questions on that LCM.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I ask for succinct questions and answers. We have until just before 10.30, and I know that members would like to get through quite a lot of questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Russell Findlay to kick off with questions on reporting and recording.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I would like to move on to some questions about the introduction of a specialist court.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much for that, DCC Graham. I also thank Katy Clark for her forbearance.
I think that Russell Findlay has a couple of questions on the gender recognition legislation.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I ask DCC Graham to come in and to be as brief as he can.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Yes. We can extend the meeting by about 15 minutes but I remind everyone that succinct questions and answers would be helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, cabinet secretary. I appreciate those comprehensive opening comments. Before we move to questions again, I remind members and witnesses to keep questions and answers as succinct as possible.
I will kick things off with a general question relating to your recent announcement regarding the establishment of the governance group to progress the detailed consideration of the Lord Justice Clerk’s recommendations. Can you outline in a little more detail the remit and timetable for the work of the governance group? In particular, how will you ensure that the group’s work does not duplicate the review that has already taken place and that it focuses on making real progress on the review recommendations and how to take them forward?