The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
The issue will now be sent to the chamber for all members to decide, based on our report.
That completes our final business for the year.
I take this opportunity to wish all members, our clerks and other staff all the very best for the festive season. I hope that you all have a happy and peaceful Christmas and new year.
I also thank all the witnesses who have given formal and informal evidence to the committee this year. It is greatly appreciated.
I now move the meeting into private.
11:36 Meeting continued in private until 11:46.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
We will compile a report and present it to Parliament.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the 33rd and final meeting in 2022 of the Criminal Justice Committee. There are no apologies this morning. Our final agenda item, under which the committee was due to consider its action plan, will be rescheduled to a future meeting.
Our first agenda item is an oral evidence session on the criminal justice provisions in the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill. Members will recall that, on 23 November, we heard from a panel of witnesses on the possible transfer of justice social work services from local government to the proposed national care service. Today, we will conclude our consideration by hearing from the Scottish Government.
I welcome Kevin Stewart, the Minister for Mental Wellbeing and Social Care; Anna Kynaston, deputy director, national care service; and Catriona Dalrymple, deputy director, community justice.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow about 60 minutes for the evidence session. I invite the minister to make a short opening statement, then we will move straight on to questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
We move to questions, and I will start. Minister, you acknowledged in your opening statement the specific role that justice social work has in our courts, among other settings. With that in mind, you will be aware of the forthcoming Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill, which the committee is beginning to consider. It includes a provision whereby justice social work would have a greater role in providing courts with information to inform decisions on bail. To date, the oral and written evidence that we have taken from witnesses suggests, perhaps not surprisingly, that that would potentially require greater resource for justice social work.
Will you outline your view on what the optimum model for justice social work would be, bearing in mind that we are at a very early stage? Would the best model be for it to remain within local authorities or to move to a care service setting?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Before I bring in Suzanne McGuinness and Sharon Stirrat, I will ask a follow-up question. In the previous sessions this morning and, indeed, in some of the written submissions, a number of practical challenges were highlighted around the provision relating to criminal justice social work. We are considering the practical application of the bill, so how can some of those practical challenges be addressed?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much, Gillian. Rhoda or Sandra, would you like to come in on that? I appreciate that this is focusing on bail and that your contribution perhaps relates more to release from custody, but you are very welcome to add anything.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks, Sandra. Rhoda, would you like to comment on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much, Gillian. I do not know whether either of our other two witnesses would like to come in. I will go to Sandra first and then Rhoda.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Sandra, we are having problems with your sound. I am advised that it might help if you speak a bit more closely into your microphone.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2022
Audrey Nicoll
Welcome back. I welcome our final panel of witnesses: Keith Gardner, specialist adviser with Community Justice Scotland; Suzanne McGuinness, executive director of social work at the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland; and Sharon Stirrat, justice social work policy and practice lead at Social Work Scotland. Keith Gardner joins us in the meeting room, and Suzanne McGuinness and Sharon Stirrat join us online. We very much appreciate your taking the time to join us.
I intend to allow about an hour for questions and answers. Given that we have two witnesses online, it would be helpful if members could indicate who their question is for and if the witnesses could indicate in the online chat function whether they would like to respond to a specific question.
I will start with a general opening question. The bill would require a court to give justice social work the opportunity to provide information relevant to bail decision making. I am interested to know whether, in broad terms, you support that provision. Can you set a bit of context around that? I will bring in Keith Gardner first.