The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is the back of 11 o’clock, so we will draw the evidence session to a close. I thank Kate Wallace and Emma Bryson for their contribution.
We will have a short suspension to allow the witnesses to leave.
11:08 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The next agenda item is consideration of legislative consent issues with regard to the United Kingdom Government’s Public Order Bill. I refer members to paper 3. You will see that the relevant provision in the bill is to extend powers similar to those currently held by Police Scotland to British Transport Police in Scotland for the policing of protests on railway land. The Scottish Government recommends that legislative consent be given to that provision.
I am happy to open the discussion to members now, and we will then consider what recommendation we want to make to Parliament on legislative consent. Do members have any queries or questions?
As there are none, the question is whether the committee agrees with the Scottish Government that the Scottish Parliament should consent to the relevant provisions in the bill as set out in the Scottish Government’s draft motion. Are members happy with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Katy Clark and then Jamie Greene. We will run the meeting for as long as we need to, but it would be helpful if questions and answers could be succinct.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Are members content to delegate to me the publication of a short report that summarises the outcome of our deliberations on the legislative consent memorandum?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The matter will now be dealt with in the chamber. All members will decide on the question, based on our report.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
It was during consideration of the Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill, which would have been earlier this year.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Oh yes—last year. It would have been in 2022.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Does Jamie Greene want to come back in?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much. There is a lot in what you have said and we can ask lots of follow-up questions, but I will bring in other members now, starting with Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next panel of witnesses consists of Dr Hannah Graham, senior lecturer in sociology, social policy and criminology in the faculty of social sciences at the University of Stirling; Professor Fergus McNeill, professor of criminology and social work at the University of Glasgow; and Professor Lesley McAra, professor of penology at Edinburgh law school, University of Edinburgh, who joins us online. I extend a warm welcome to you all.
We move straight to questions, for which we have around an hour. I will open with a general question in reference to the joint submission from Dr Graham and Professor McNeill in which you comment on the grounds for refusing bail. Your joint submission says:
“The proposed two-part test for grounds for refusing bail, centring on public safety and risk of harm, is reasonable. It is constructive that safety considerations of complainers are acknowledged within this.”
We have just heard evidence from Victim Support Scotland, which is keen to put victims’ voices at the heart of the process of considering bail. In the context of the comments that you have made, do you have further comments given what we have heard this morning? Perhaps Dr Graham could start, followed by Professor McNeill, and then I will bring in Professor McAra.