The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much. That is extremely helpful and will open up some supplementary questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Professor Loucks, would you like to respond?
11:45Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much.
I will ask a follow-up question, but will Emma Bryson pick up that question first?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
A very good morning, and welcome to the first meeting in 2023 of the Criminal Justice Committee. I wish everyone a very happy new year. Apologies from Pauline McNeill have been noted.
Our first item of business is an oral evidence session on the Bail and Release from Custody (Scotland) Bill. Consideration of the bill will be our main item of business over the next few weeks.
Two panels are joining us today. Our first witnesses are Kate Wallace from Victim Support Scotland and Emma Bryson from Speak Out Survivors. I welcome both of you.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow about 60 minutes for this session. As ever, I would appreciate fairly succinct questions and responses. As time is quite tight, we will move straight to questions.
I will open with a general question for Kate Wallace. We thank you for the submission that Victim Support Scotland has provided to us. In that submission, Victim Support Scotland set out its general concerns about the proposed provisions relating to the use of bail and remand. Will you update members on the details of your concerns, particularly about the new test? I will also bring in Emma Bryson on that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I will bring in Collette Stevenson and then Russell Findlay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I hand over to Russell Findlay, and then I will bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for raising that point. I am happy with the question and I was happy to give Dr Graham a chance to respond. I do not intend to take any more questions relating to political views. I would like the session to come back to the bill. On that note, we will hear from Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is fine.
I concur with the views that have been expressed. It would be helpful for us to seek up-to-date data from the SCTS on the number of fully virtual trials that have taken place since we got the previous figures almost a year ago, when we were looking at the coronavirus legislation. I am happy to take that forward on members’ behalf.
In relation to the concerns about the role of defence agents in opposing virtual trials, there might be an opportunity for us to ask the Lord Justice Clerk why, despite the practice note that they issued, the practical reality is that very few such trials seem to be taking place.
Finally, in relation to the comments that were made about the cabinet secretary, I wonder whether members would agree that we should ask him to refer to the justice board and the governance group that is overseeing Lady Dorrian’s report to get more clarity on why there are still very few virtual trials, despite the fact that there is provision for them.
Do members agree that I should take those tasks away?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks very much. Before I hand over to other members, I will pick up on the risk assessment process that Kate Wallace outlined and which Victim Support Scotland wants to see as part of the consideration process. The proposal in the bill is that criminal justice social work would have a big role in informing bail decisions.
I am interested in your views on who else or which other organisations it would be appropriate to have participate in the process, particularly given the concerns that you have outlined for victims and the importance of their voices being heard in that decision-making process.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 January 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will just ask a quick follow-up to that and then bring in Emma Bryson. Going back to the sessions that we had, I was not surprised that one of the people to whom we spoke told us that she received a lot of information from the police. In your view, who should have responsibility for communicating with a victim, particularly around, for example, the outcome of a bail appeal or a bail review and some of the other decision making that takes place? Who do you feel is best positioned to have responsibility for that role, or does it stretch across different organisations such as Victim Support and the court system?