The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is a fair point to raise. The action plan is almost a chronology of developments, so I am not overly worried about the fact that the sentence does not seem to fit—things fluctuate and change as time goes on. However, if you would prefer an update, that is absolutely fine.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Does anyone else want to come in quickly?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is a helpful update. Thanks for that.
Before we conclude the item, I place on record the committee’s thanks to David Hamilton, chair of the Scottish Police Federation, for bringing the issue to our attention. As we know, David is moving on from that role, so on behalf of the committee, I wish him well in his future endeavours and whatever challenges he moves on to.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item is consideration of correspondence from the Lord Justice General, the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service and the Scottish Government on virtual trials. I refer members to paper 5 and open it up to members for comment.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. We will now move to questions. I intend to allow 45 minutes for members to ask questions.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
You are asking the same question. I ask you to ask another question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will move things on, so that other members have the opportunity to ask questions. If we have time, I will come back to that issue.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Perhaps I can—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We are just about coming up to time, but, in recognition of the importance of and interest in this issue, I am happy to bring in a couple of final questions. I will start with Russell Findlay, who I know has a question, and then I will bring in Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I will shortly invite the cabinet secretary to make any further comments as he wishes. However, I will stay with the issue of revealing the whereabouts of a victim’s body. The cabinet secretary specifically referred to some of the circumstances where there are ECHR rights considerations. Would that include a situation where, for example, an individual who has been convicted of a murder is unable to disclose the whereabouts of a body? That could be because of a health condition that that person has, or, as the cabinet secretary mentioned, because they cannot remember: they might remember the broad area, but they cannot be specific about it because of the passage of time. Essentially, including a requirement to reveal the whereabouts of a victim’s body as part of the parole hearing process is akin to having two bites of the cherry, given that the refusal to reveal the whereabouts prior to sentencing would have already been taken into account when the sentence was imposed.