The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3543 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much for what, as always, was a comprehensive response. I will bring in Amanda Masson and then open it up to questions from other members.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Amanda, would you like to come in on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That concludes our public session. I thank everyone who has joined us.
12:36 Meeting continued in private until 13:00.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I thank the cabinet secretary and his officials for their time this morning. We will have a brief suspension to allow them to leave.
10:03 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Before we move on, Amanda Masson and Dr Scott want to come in. I bring in Amanda first. Please be as brief as you can.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item is the consideration of a negative instrument. I refer members to paper 2.
If members have no questions, are we content not to make any recommendations to Parliament on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That brings us nicely to the end of our evidence session. We are grateful for your answers to our questions. Before you leave, would any of you like to make a final comment on what, specifically, we need to think about that has perhaps not already been articulated or reflected this morning, as we continue our post-legislative scrutiny of the 2018 act? Do you have any final points to raise?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
We will have a brief suspension to allow the room to be set up for our next agenda item.
10:04 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning and welcome to the eighth meeting in 2023 of the Criminal Justice Committee. There are no apologies.
Our first item of business is a decision whether to take in private item 6, which is our review of the evidence that we will hear today. Do members agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Audrey Nicoll
I concur with pretty much all the comments that have been made. Jamie Greene made a good suggestion that we look at some data in relation to the provisions on emergency workers and proxy purchases. I am happy to take that forward.
The letter is a bit light touch, so it would be helpful for us to have more detail, in particular on some of the key points that members have raised. Across the committee, there are various levels of concern about pretty much all the key updates that have been provided.
I am happy for us to write back to the minister to seek not only some data, as Jamie Greene outlined, but more detail on the key points that were outlined in the correspondence and a reassurance that every effort will be made to keep the timescales on track and minimise slippage. There is public interest in this issue. Pauline McNeill’s point about costs is well made, and we will incorporate that in our correspondence.
I think that Katy Clark agreed with the suggestion that we contact the minister by way of a follow-up letter. I see that she is nodding.