The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3377 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We will have an opportunity for more questions on part 3 later.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Ben Macpherson, did you want to come in here? I will then bring in Katy Clark and Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I want to make sure that our time is used to focus specifically on amendments. I completely understand where you come from with your question, but I remind members that the focus is on amendments.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
It is helpful to confirm that point.
I am aware of the time and will finish up with a couple of questions. The first is about part 3 of the bill, which deals with special measures. I know that we touched on those earlier. My second question relates to a separate but interconnected issue that was raised during the stage 1 evidence and on which I would welcome the cabinet secretary’s response, which is the pilot of free court transcripts.
First, I come back to the special measures in civil cases. Will you give us a broad commentary on the thinking behind the proposed amendments to those provisions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I am pleased to say that we have a new group of officials. We still have Nicola Guild and Heather Reece Wells with us, and we are now joined by Andrew Baird and Carole Robinson—welcome to you.
We will pick up where we left off and move on to parts 5 and 6.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We still have three more members who want to come in on part 4, so I will bring in Katy Clark and then Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much, indeed, cabinet secretary. I want to pick up on your final point, which was in relation to the proposals around jury size and the jury majority requirement. In your helpful and detailed correspondence, you stated that, as you set out in your opening remarks, you will
“seek support for a model with two verdicts, fifteen jurors, and a two thirds majority requirement for conviction.”
Can you give more detail on why you are looking at that particular model and on what has been raised by stakeholders and other interested parties that has led to it being the preferred model?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is most appreciated. We will have a short suspension to allow for a changeover of officials.
11:23 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much for your forbearance. For the record, we are now joined by Simon Stockwell, Heather Reece Wells and Sarah Crawford, who are the Government officials accompanying the cabinet secretary. We will go straight to parts 1, 2 and 3 of the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will take the liberty of asking a final question that perhaps relates to trauma-informed practice. As I said earlier, one of the issues that was raised during stage 1 was about access to court transcripts for complainers. You helpfully wrote to the committee recently to say that the pilot for providing free transcripts for complainers in High Court sexual offences cases is to be extended for a further 12 months, which is welcome. We are aware that some campaigners have suggested that the bill might be an opportunity to make the pilot permanent. What are your views on that suggestion?