The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3900 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. To go back to part of your earlier answer to the question, am I right in saying that offenders convicted of higher-tariff domestic abuse offences could possibly be managed under the MAPPA process?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I have a final question on training. When we introduce any new process, particularly around risk management and risk assessment, a level of training is required for the staff and police officers who are going to use that process. We have not touched on that specifically to a great extent in relation to the bill, but I am generally interested in what training commitments and costs can be involved when a new process, such as a risk management or notification process, is introduced, particularly when it is introduced across more than one stakeholder or organisation.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. We are near the end of our time, but I would like to follow up on a couple of points. In our previous line of questioning, we talked about existing practice and arrangements. Emma Forbes spoke about how long it can take for processes and arrangements such as MARAC to roll out—I remember when MARAC was first introduced in Scotland, and it feels like a lifetime ago.
To come back to Detective Superintendent Brown and Glyn Lloyd on the disclosure scheme, would any of the bill’s provisions change how decisions are made around disclosure or what would be disclosed? Is there sufficient awareness of the disclosure scheme? I do not think that we teased out those points earlier, so any comments that you have would be helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Do you agree that there would be significant implications for the operational officers and staff who would have to inform that process? That is my concern. It would ultimately be another new responsibility that, to a certain extent, would draw people away from front-line responses. Is that a fair assessment?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The implications for resources were certainly brought out in your submission. Thank you for that.
09:15Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
There is quite a bit for us to think about in those answers, so I will not ask any follow-up questions at the moment. However, I will probably come back in later.
Sharon Dowey, do you want to come in on this line of questioning?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We are just over time, so I will draw the evidence session to a close. Thank you very much for joining us this morning—some helpful points were raised in response to our questions.
10:38 Meeting continued in private until 13:02.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Detective Superintendent Brown, do you have any views on that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Pauline McNeill, do you want to come in with any questions beyond the supplementary questions that you asked earlier? If not, I will open up the discussion to any members for final questions. We have a wee bit of time in hand.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Professor Gilchrist, do you want to come in at all?