The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3541 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
As there are no further questions, we move to our next item of business, which is formal consideration of the negative instrument that we have discussed. Are members content to make no recommendations in relation to the instrument and for it to come into force?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I thank the cabinet secretary and Mr Down for their attendance. We will have a brief pause while we have a changeover of witnesses.
10:11 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I have a couple of final questions. We spoke earlier about nationality bars. The National Crime Agency recently told the House of Lords that about 10 per cent of extradition requests are now being refused because of nationality bars and that, before Brexit, those requests would probably have been successful. You mentioned that as one of your key areas of focus. Gemma Davies, what further scrutiny can the Parliament undertake or offer on that particular issue?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I have just looked at my notes and I see that you did include it in your presentation—that was my oversight.
Ben Macpherson, do you want to come back in? Then I will bring in Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Following the signing of the trade and co-operation agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union in 2020, the committee asked our colleagues in the Scottish Parliament information centre and the Scottish Parliament academic fellowship programme to undertake a piece of research, the aim of which was to assess the impact of Brexit on Scotland’s criminal justice system and our co-ordination and co-operation with EU member states.
Two members of the academic fellowship undertook that research and published their findings in September 2024. I am very pleased that they are here today to give us an overview of the evidence from that work and to highlight the areas that they believe the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government should work on with the UK Government to improve the way that the Scottish criminal justice system and policing interact with the EU under the trade and co-operation agreement. I refer members to paper 2, which sets out the findings and recommendations of the research and contains links to the main research report and the slide presentation that we will receive this morning.
I warmly welcome Gemma Davies, associate professor in criminal law at Durham University, and Helena Farrand Carrapico, professor of international relations and European politics at Northumbria University. Without any further ado, I invite Gemma and Helena to give a presentation on their research work, after which I will open up the meeting to questions from committee members.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the 14th meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received apologies from Pauline McNeill and Fulton MacGregor, and Sharon Dowey joins us online.
Our first item of business is an opportunity to put questions to the Scottish Government on a negative instrument that is scheduled to come into force on 30 November this year. I refer members to paper 1, which sets out the purpose of the instrument.
We are joined this morning by Angela Constance, Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs, and Patrick Down, criminal law and procedure team leader at the Scottish Government. Welcome to you both, and thank you for joining us. I invite the cabinet secretary to say a few words about the purpose of the Scottish statutory instrument.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is the consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument that is subject to the negative procedure. I refer members to paper 1, which sets out the purpose of the regulations. I declare an interest, which is that I am a former police officer.
Do members wish to make any recommendations in relation to the negative instrument, or are we content that it comes into force?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Absolutely—thank you for that helpful suggestion.
We have covered some action points, but are there any further action points that members wish to suggest, or are we content with where we are? As there are no further comments, we move into private session.
10:10 Meeting continued in private until 10:39.Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that suggestion. The cabinet secretary provided the cross-committee group with an initial response, which formed part of our scrutiny at the cross-committee group. However, it is a helpful suggestion that we consolidate the Government’s position on the recommendations, so I am happy to take that away as an action point. We can come back with a written update on the recommendations, aligned with the work that has already been completed or is already under way—and which the Scottish Government has already provided an update on—along with the outstanding work that you have referenced. I am happy to pull that together for the committee.