The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3544 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Absolutely. It is interesting that you say that, in your view, some of the recommendations should not have been particularly problematic to implement. Do you have a view on why progress was not made with those ones?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item of business is to decide whether to take items 6 and 7 in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Under the next item of business, we are to review the progress that is being made on improving the response to deaths in prison custody. I welcome Gill Imery, who is the external chair overseeing implementation of the independent review of the response to deaths in prison custody.
I refer members to paper 2, which contains background information on Gill Imery’s work and a short summary setting out her views on the progress that is being made in response to the recommendations that are contained in the review report. I intend to run the evidence session for about 60 minutes, although we have a little bit of time in hand.
I invite Gill to make a short opening statement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. I will open up the session to members and hand over to Russell Findlay. Other members can indicate when they would like to come in.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
The aggravator is clearly an operational issue and whether it is appropriate to include it would be at officers’ discretion, but I note your point.
My recollection is that we were quite keen that something like a public awareness campaign be explored because there are previous indications that that would be quite effective.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Indeed. I have one final question about the feelings of families, as things stand, in respect of the slow pace of implementation of the recommendations. You clearly have close contact with families. What do they feel about where we are now?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thanks for that—I remember that we raised that valid point. Consideration of that model is, potentially, quite a big piece of work to undertake, but we can ask more questions, because it is a valid point.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That is fine. We can check that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
That concludes our business in public. Next week, we will begin our stage 1 evidence taking on the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, and we will hear from the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs.
11:33 Meeting continued in private until 12:09.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. Before I bring in other members, I will ask a general question about the expectation around timescales. There was one key recommendation and a number of other recommendations. Given that the recommendations apply across a system rather than across just one organisation, was there an expectation of how long might be considered reasonable for the recommendations to be implemented?