The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3541 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Before I bring in other members, I have a follow-on question for Professor White. You have described some of the impacts very powerfully. Would there be some value in considering aspects of that as part of more consistent and more effective data recording on non-fatal strangulation? We are aware that there is currently an issue with a lack of data and data recording, and I think that we all agree that improvements are needed in that area. How important is it to incorporate into that data collection process some of the impacts of non-fatal strangulation that you have described?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. We have about 25 minutes left, as we will have to close the session at 12.20. As a number of members still want to come in, I ask for succinct questions and answers so that everyone can ask their questions.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Katy and then come back to you, Fulton, if you still want to ask a question.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Liam Kerr to bring the evidence session to a close with a final question, but, before I do so, I note that I have to leave in a few minutes to attend another commitment. I do not want to curtail the evidence session, because this is a really important discussion, so I will hand over to Liam, our deputy convener, to convene the rest of the meeting.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That brings us up to time. I thank our witnesses for their contributions, which have given us a really helpful insight into the issue.
It goes without saying that people who have been watching this evidence session might be affected by what has been discussed. I remind everyone that the EmilyTest website, which can be found at www.emilytest.org, includes guidance and training material and is a very useful resource for people to access.
I again thank our panel members. We will have a short suspension for around 10 minutes for a comfort break and a changeover of witnesses.
11:02 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that comprehensive overview, which was very helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Detective Superintendent Brown, we have spoken about DASH, the risk-assessment process that front-line officers complete. Early gathering of accurate and robust information about the circumstances of an incident is crucial, and we have spoken about question 15, which relates to strangulation, choking or suffocation. From a Police Scotland perspective, regardless of whether we ultimately create a stand-alone offence, given the significance of that particular act, is there scope for that question to be expanded or developed so that it is more effective?
11:30Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our main item of business is an evidence session on non-fatal strangulation, which includes consideration of the issues raised by petition PE2136, in the name of Fiona Drouet, who joins us today. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to make non-fatal strangulation a stand-alone criminal offence in Scotland.
Non-fatal strangulation is not currently a stand-alone offence in Scotland. Instead, it is prosecuted under a range of criminal offences. As a result, data on the number of offences that have included an element of non-fatal strangulation in Scotland is not readily available.
Since June 2022, non-fatal strangulation has been a stand-alone offence in England and Wales, and legislation creating a new offence of non-fatal strangulation came into effect in Northern Ireland in June 2023.
As members are aware, the Scottish Government’s 2025-26 programme for government commits to carrying out
“a comprehensive assessment of the law in relation to non-fatal strangulation to determine if there is further action that needs to be taken beyond existing provisions in law that could be used to tackle this issue.”
We have two panels of witnesses with us this morning. First, I warmly welcome Fiona Drouet, who lodged the petition and is the chief executive officer and founder of EmilyTest; Fiona McMullen, the operations manager for Advocacy Support Safety Information Services Together; and Professor Cath White, the medical director at the Institute for Addressing Strangulation.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2, and I thank those who provided us with written evidence in advance of today’s session. I intend to allow an hour or so for this panel.
I will begin with a general opening question to get us started. Can you explain to the committee what the mental and physical impacts of non-fatal strangulation can be on victims in the short term and the longer term?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Fulton MacGregor, do you want to come in with a follow-up to Sharon’s first question?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Chris, do you have a view on the emotional toll on victims and the impact on their wellbeing?