The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1621 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I have stats for domestic abuse, but I do not have that specific information, unless my officials do. I am happy to write to the committee on that specific point.
The issue of data collection has been raised in the evidence sessions—I am acutely aware of it, and there needs to be improvement there. Data improvement has been a clear focus of the domestic abuse justice partners round table, and work to date has included reviewing and mapping domestic abuse-related data held by justice partners, with particular reference to data on protected characteristics.
The group is currently progressing a working paper that will draw together the findings of the data-mapping exercise, including identifying data gaps and what opportunities there might be for data improvement.
I agree that we need to improve data, but there is work on-going. Graham Robertson might have more stats for you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
Graham Robertson might want to come in on that in relation to the protection side. It is quite a specific question. Each piece of legislation would differ in terms of what was being implemented, so the cost of the training involved would be very variable.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
There are some things that can be done with regard to sex offences, which is a different subject. However, in relation to your bill, I think that there are processes in place. I know that the member is passionate about this area. It is unfortunate that we are not in a position to see how the bill’s provisions could fit in with the system that is already in place for domestic abuse.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I am listening to the evidence from stakeholders. I have not been approached by anyone in any of my meetings who has said that such a change would make people safer.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I would like to see it rolled out in all 32 local authorities.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
We could consider that, if it could be integrated into the current system in future. As I said, the Scottish Government is open to considering anything that could be implementable and valuable.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
I will bring in Michael Paparakis, if I may.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
It is in the explanatory notes, not in the legislation. We think that that covers things, guidance-wise. That is how we are future proofing the legislation, instead of being too specific in the bill itself, because who knows what the mode of communication could be in five to 10 years? We feel that that is sufficient, but we are open to suggestions, if the committee thinks that it can be strengthened.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
The postal acceptance rule means that contracts can be formed without one party ever knowing that their offer has been accepted, and I agree with the majority of stakeholders that that is at odds with common-sense expectations. The law causes uncertainty and confusion for anyone who is not aware of the postal acceptance rule, and I understand that, in practice, it is commonly excluded by well-informed parties. Abolishing the rule will mean that the law will align better with reasonable expectations of most people, including small and micro businesses. As I have said several times, people have been calling for the rule to be abolished for more than 50 years.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft[
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Siobhian Brown
Yes, I do.