The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1480 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Because, due to the financial climate that we are in, the Government does not have a pot of money lying around that we can just take from. Significant decisions have to be made when thinking about new spending allocations.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
That was to discussing proposals for potential amendments.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I cannot comment further on the ministerial decision-making process. I am sorry—I cannot give you any further information on that.
I am not sure whether Kirstie McKerron is able to provide further clarity.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
As I said, I cannot comment. It is not that I am not willing to comment. It is part of the ministerial code that I cannot comment further on the decision-making processes.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I am saying that I cannot comment further on the ministerial decision-making process.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Sorry, but are you referring to the pilot approach?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
To be clear, the Government does not just have £5 million or £6 million spare to put forward for this. Any funding or money is subject to the budget process. As I said, the Government has been working, alongside the work on the bill, on a potential non-legislative pilot approach. If that was taken forward, the budget for it would have to be negotiated and considered through the budgetary process.
Mr Mason makes relevant points, but they would need to perhaps pre-empt the financial resolution and could be discussed in relation to a pilot approach.
I am sorry, but I am not aware whether a bill could be pulled at this stage. I might need to seek further clarity around that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Sorry. Mr Mason asked—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
Again, I do not want to pre-empt a decision; however, I have been very clear about and emphasised my support for the outdoor residential groups. In my opening statement, I alluded to a number of actions that the Government is taking and a number of areas in which the Government is already working to support the residential outdoor sector.
I do not want to pre-empt the decision, but I emphasise my support for the sector and my understanding of the difference that residential trips can make for children and young people, which we discussed at length at the previous committee meeting. I will leave it there for now.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2025
Natalie Don-Innes
I met COSLA representatives, who had some grave concerns around the bill, specifically around the lack of data on affordability, and around supporting children with additional support needs. Probably the biggest concern of all was the workforce implications, which have not been addressed or costed.
In my meeting with the trade unions, I heard a lot of concerns around the workforce. It has been assumed that teachers will continue to do that work on a voluntary basis, but we know that, once something is put into statute, that might not continue to be the case. I have heard that directly from some of those organisations.
I believe that the committee heard that, at times, teachers are advised not to do things on a voluntary basis. That is an issue, especially if the bill becomes a statute. The teacher unions were very keen to engage with Ms Smith on that—not to discuss negotiations or anything like that, but to allay their concerns about the assumptions in the bill and the implications for the workforce.