The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1364 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Paul McLennan
We have heard evidence about different policy frameworks across different services, including schools and care settings. Childcare providers, too, have given evidence about the use of restraint and seclusion. Does the bill present a risk of dual reporting in some settings, such as schools with early learning and childcare classes or residential facilities? We have heard from staff at schools with residential facilities. Is there a reporting issue here? What are your thoughts about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Paul McLennan
I know that I am slightly moving our discussion beyond the scope of the bill in asking this, but if that area is outwith the bill’s scope, where do you see it falling when it comes to what happens next? We heard evidence from residential schools about that.
Let me clarify that. We are considering the scope of the bill. You have deliberately not widened it to include residential schools, so how do you see that aspect developing? It is something that we should consider.
10:15Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
As you said, and as the minister said, learning from the best practice is really important.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
That is something for us to consider.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
Do you see a timescale for that? I note our timescales in moving the bill forward after today’s discussion. You have mentioned a consultation and discussion: where do you see the timescales around that? That is not to put you on the spot, but could you give us a rough idea?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
I have a supplementary question. We heard evidence from the chief executive of Aberdeenshire Council about how it embeds what the Promise is trying to do into its services. You are going to have a challenge with IJBs, which include health boards and local authorities. Can you say a little more about what the engagement work will be after the bill is passed? What is next for the IJBs? You have advocated for the importance of IJBs, but what will the concrete next steps be after the bill is passed? How will we embed the bill and the culture that it will promote into the work that the IJBs do? That has to be sustainable, but the quicker we can do it, the better it will be for everyone concerned. Can you say a little more about how you see that developing?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
Gavin, do you want to come in?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
Miles Briggs’s point about advocacy came through quite strongly, and you said that you would look at that, minister, so I do not expect you to expand on it. Advocacy also came through very strongly when we met the care-experienced kids.
Gavin Henderson touched on another issue that came through strongly at that meeting, which was aftercare advocacy. In itself, aftercare is fine, but I am asking about advocacy services for children aged up to 16 and then up to age 26. An issue that came through strongly was about advocacy all through those people’s lives. The people who come out of the care experience will come through it in different ways, but there is still that trauma attached to some of them. The importance of whole-life advocacy came through in our meeting.
I come from a local authority background, where we see kids going through the care system and then having kids, who then have the same issues. It is about breaking that cycle.
Can you say a bit more about whole-life advocacy, which came through strongly when we met the group of care-experienced kids? I know that, as you said, local authorities and health boards have to come in, and I know that there is a whole-Government approach, but I would like to hear how you see whole-life advocacy all the way through the system.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you, convener. I want to build on the engagement aspect, because it is important to bring this back to why we are really doing this, which is engagement with children and young people. Could you say a little bit about that?
I joined the committee during the most humbling part of this process: I listened in on our session with the kids. We met with 40-odd care-experienced kids and that was the most humbling experience. I want to bring this back to the most important part of the process. What was your official engagement with children and young people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Paul McLennan
That is really helpful.
I want to move on from children’s hearings, and my next question is more about children’s services planning. As we have heard today, that involves Government and local authorities, but health comes into it, too. Integration joint boards, in particular, are a really important aspect. I remember the role of IJBs in tackling homelessness from my time as Minister for Housing.
One of the key things is the proposal about IJBs and how they are required to plan. What are the key objectives and drivers behind that and how do they tie in with the bill? What work will be done in future? Legislation is legislation, but the key thing is how it is implemented and embedded. How will we move beyond the bill to embed the culture change that is required?