The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1351 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I will just come in on that point, because it is important. I remember meeting with an organisation in my constituency; there were parents there with children who had gone through that experience. Those children are now in their 20s or 30s, and the trauma is still there. We talk about the need for the bill—the trauma is still there 10, 15 or 20 years later, for a lot of the parents and obviously for the children themselves. That is a really important point.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Sarah Leitch?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
My apologies for being late, convener—I was stuck in an accident this morning.
Some of the debate has been around disabled pupils and pupils with complex needs, and those who are care experienced. Is the balance right in the bill, or should there be more specific guidance on specific aspects—for example, relating to those with care experience?
As members, we have probably all dealt with casework on these issues and heard parents talking about them. In your view, should there be specific guidance on the different areas where restraint and seclusion might be applicable?
I will come to Kate Sanger first, as I know that she has particular expertise in this area. Kate, what are your thoughts on that point?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I will go to Simon Webster next—I will come to Suzi Martin in a minute.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
You have already kind of answered my next question, which Willie Rennie also touched on. What do you think of the current Government guidance? What do you think about having statutory guidance? Do you want to add anything to what was said when he asked about that? I think that Suzi answered the question, so I ask Kate and Simon where they think that the guidance should sit and whether they have anything else to add about guidance becoming statutory.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I will ask about the definition of a child. The definition in the bill is taken from the Education (Scotland) Act 1980, which is not the same as the definition in the UNCRC. The commissioner and others have suggested that the bill should mirror the UNCRC. What are the practical and legal impacts of those different definitions?
I have a second question, which is on an issue that we have touched on and which I will put to Nicola Killean first. What are the strengths and weaknesses of having statutory guidance rather than non-statutory guidance?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Ben Higgins, I come to you on those two questions on guidance and on the UNCRC definition.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
That is a good point, and it has got me thinking of another question. Kate Sanger talked about the level of expertise in schools, and about training. I am in East Lothian, where we have a number of schools in a geographically tight area. Some schools have an area of expertise that means that kids from all over East Lothian go there and the teachers also get more training. It is important to get a balance between what is provided at local authority level and what happens in each individual town, because parents and children might have to travel. Suzi, what are your thoughts on that?
Kate spoke about focusing on training, but are we spreading that too thinly? Should we try to have specific schools that have expertise in dealing with kids who have learning disabilities until that training is in place? I ask Kate and Suzi for their thoughts on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I am not sure how to follow that.
I have a more general question about the UNCRC, which Lynne O’Brien touched on. Several respondents have commented on the drafting of sections 1 and 2, on aftercare, and section 10, on the register of foster carers, which amend the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. As that is pre-devolution UK legislation, it falls outwith the scope of the UNCRC.
What are your views on that small but important point? Significant issues could be created if we do not get that aspect right. I will come to Lynne first, as she raised the issue.