The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1337 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Louise Church, do you have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul McLennan
That was going to be the follow-up question, as you probably heard from previous evidence sessions. The point has been made that you could have a mature eight-year-old, or an immature 12-year-old. It is therefore about where the line is.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul McLennan
As an extension of that, at the previous meeting of the committee we asked about the UNCRC. We specifically mentioned article 12 on the right to be heard and article 14 on freedom of thought. We have heard from various witnesses that there are issues to do with compatibility with the UNCRC. What are your thoughts on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul McLennan
I want to ask a bit more about specific proposals in the bill. We have talked about withdrawal from RO and RME. I have three questions about the process. The first is about the requirement for schools to inform a child if a parent asks for them to be withdrawn from either or both RO and RME. Under the proposals, when such a request is made, the child will be given an opportunity to express their views, the school must have a discussion about that and it must respect the child’s views if they differ from those of their parents. We have touched on issues around that, but I am asking more about the specific proposals in the bill. Juliet Harris, I will come to you first for your thoughts on that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul McLennan
Gina and Gavin, you are nodding. Does anyone alse have anything to add? You all seem to be in agreement on that. Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Paul McLennan
This question is more about the processes that are proposed in the bill. It is the same question that I put to the previous panel, and it is about the requirement for schools to inform a child if their parent asks for them to be withdrawn from RO and RME. When such a request has been made, the child is given an opportunity to express their views, the school must seek to have a discussion with the child, and a school must respect the child’s wishes if their views differ from those of the parent.
Susan, I will come to you first, given your experience as a teacher. What are your thoughts on that, and on the process that has been outlined?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
The medium-term financial strategy does not go into that level of detail. What are your thoughts? Can you say more about how engagement with the Scottish Funding Council will work in the future?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
That is a really good point, Tom. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
On that point, witnesses in the earlier evidence session spoke about the training requirements and whether local authorities look at one centre if they are dealing with kids who might be more susceptible to restraint or seclusion over that period of time. Or should that training or resource be spread out? Has the EIS discussed that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Paul McLennan
I want to build a little bit on John Mason’s points about the medium-term financial strategy. The strategy says that the Government will focus on
“Supporting sustainable, inclusive, economic policies with the greatest potential to grow Scotland’s economy”.
You have already talked about the importance of that, minister, and I suppose that we have discussed some of the immediate issues, but for me, one of the key questions is how we maximise growth in Scotland’s colleges to match the growth in the economy. Will you say a little bit more about the medium-term financial strategy and how we tie up opportunities for economic growth with opportunities for growth in the colleges themselves? The SFC has told us that that is a particular issue, so what can we do to maximise opportunities in college courses and maximise income for the colleges?