The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1418 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
My apologies for being late, convener—I was stuck in an accident this morning.
Some of the debate has been around disabled pupils and pupils with complex needs, and those who are care experienced. Is the balance right in the bill, or should there be more specific guidance on specific aspects—for example, relating to those with care experience?
As members, we have probably all dealt with casework on these issues and heard parents talking about them. In your view, should there be specific guidance on the different areas where restraint and seclusion might be applicable?
I will come to Kate Sanger first, as I know that she has particular expertise in this area. Kate, what are your thoughts on that point?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I will go to Simon Webster next—I will come to Suzi Martin in a minute.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
You have already kind of answered my next question, which Willie Rennie also touched on. What do you think of the current Government guidance? What do you think about having statutory guidance? Do you want to add anything to what was said when he asked about that? I think that Suzi answered the question, so I ask Kate and Simon where they think that the guidance should sit and whether they have anything else to add about guidance becoming statutory.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I will ask about the definition of a child. The definition in the bill is taken from the Education (Scotland) Act 1980, which is not the same as the definition in the UNCRC. The commissioner and others have suggested that the bill should mirror the UNCRC. What are the practical and legal impacts of those different definitions?
I have a second question, which is on an issue that we have touched on and which I will put to Nicola Killean first. What are the strengths and weaknesses of having statutory guidance rather than non-statutory guidance?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Ben Higgins, I come to you on those two questions on guidance and on the UNCRC definition.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Paul McLennan
That is a good point, and it has got me thinking of another question. Kate Sanger talked about the level of expertise in schools, and about training. I am in East Lothian, where we have a number of schools in a geographically tight area. Some schools have an area of expertise that means that kids from all over East Lothian go there and the teachers also get more training. It is important to get a balance between what is provided at local authority level and what happens in each individual town, because parents and children might have to travel. Suzi, what are your thoughts on that?
Kate spoke about focusing on training, but are we spreading that too thinly? Should we try to have specific schools that have expertise in dealing with kids who have learning disabilities until that training is in place? I ask Kate and Suzi for their thoughts on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
I will move on, and I will ask Duncan Dunlop to respond to this question first. Some of the submissions to the committee said that there needs to be clarity on the bill’s proposal for guidance in relation to care experience to ensure that it is effective. You touched on that earlier. There was also a range of views about who should be included in any proposed definition.
How can the Scottish Government ensure that the provisions have a positive impact on care-experienced people, and how do you suggest work to decide on a definition—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Duncan Dunlop has mentioned advocacy and Jo Derrick has spoken about aftercare, and both have made important points. I previously used an example of kids who are about 15 or 16 who were ready for the transition. They had issues with housing and concerns about what their next step in life would be, and very little support was provided. Getting that start in life could have made a huge impact on them.
There is another question about geographical differences. The care that someone will be provided will be very different in rural Aberdeenshire or the Highlands and Islands compared to urban Glasgow and Edinburgh. We have not really discussed that, but we need to ensure that the level of care, support and advocacy is not impacted by geography.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
My question is on some general points. Who Cares? Scotland, The Promise Scotland and the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland commented on the drafting of sections 1 and 2, on aftercare. Laura Pasternak, you mentioned that issue, as well as the issue of section 10’s amendment of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 in relation to the register of foster carers. Of course, the 1995 act is pre-devolution UK legislation that falls outwith the scope of the UNCRC, as you noted. What are your views on how that section has been drafted, and what might be done at stage 2 to bring it into scope?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Paul McLennan
Jo, do you have any views on the point about the UNCRC in the context of aftercare?