The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1235 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Paul McLennan
Was there much consultation with the public on the issue? Was there feedback from members of the public on the number of councillors that they want for their ward area?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Paul McLennan
I, too, refer everyone to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am a councillor on East Lothian Council. I will direct my question to Karen Greaves first. What are your views on how Boundaries Scotland has applied the criteria for boundary reform during the review?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Paul McLennan
My question is for Maggie Sandison. I think that both witnesses have already touched on this, but could variations in the voter-to-councillor ratio across wards impact on effective and convenient local government? Obviously, the issue is relevant to the isles, so I would like to hear your thoughts on it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
Paul McLennan
Thank you for that, Maggie. I ask the same question of Douglas Hendry and then Derek Mackay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Paul McLennan
Okay. Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Paul McLennan
On that point—and this might be anecdotal—when complaints and cases come in, does the member of the public who is complaining understand the details of the 2021 act, or does the complaint come in and you then have to say that it relates to paragraph 7 or whatever of the code of conduct? Do complainants quote the act? I am just trying to get an understanding. Is there a better understanding of the code itself or is it just that, as you said, people have had more time and send in something general that they think is out of order? I am trying to understand the balance.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Paul McLennan
I take it that there is appropriate feedback. If a case or a complaint comes in, there is feedback as to why it not possible to go any further.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Paul McLennan
Yes—it leads on to my question. The “Diversity Delivers” strategy is important and was the first equal opportunities strategy on ministerial appointments. I understand that a change to primary legislation is needed if it is to be updated. What process would that entail?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Paul McLennan
Thanks for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Paul McLennan
Convener, I seek your guidance, and we can probably get guidance from the clerk as well. I attended the first meeting of the CPG on independent convenience stores, but not as an office bearer. I arrived at the meeting late and was not party to the discussions. However, we should probably take a view on whether I should take part in this discussion—I want to check that.
The second point that I want to make, before we get on to the discussion, is about our own role in CPGs. We will all be involved in various CPGs—maybe as members, maybe as conveners—and I think that, for the clarity, openness and transparency of this committee going forward, it would be good to discuss our own positions as either conveners or members of CPGs and to have guidance on that.