The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1379 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Paul McLennan
The question is about taking up roles in the sectors. As you said, education seems to be one, but we are talking about 2 per cent of the population. I have spoken to constituents before about some of the issues they have with healthcare, for example, so I am interested in making sure that there is representation across all the sectors. Are we looking back and evaluating that, or could we consider doing that going forward?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Paul McLennan
Good morning, Deputy First Minister. I have a couple of questions, and I am conscious of the time.
One question is on issues of data and disaggregating data, and I will come back to you for your thoughts on that one. One of the other key issues relates to education, health and justice. It was suggested that better support for BSL users would include people who encourage BSL users to take up roles in those areas. How can we encourage that to happen in the future? The issue is a little about the data, but probably more on encouraging BSL users into the roles where they can make a real impact.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Paul McLennan
It is not a major point, but I think it is important that we pick it up. If you could come back to us, that would be great.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Paul McLennan
On the specific point of encouraging BSL users to take up the roles, do we monitor that at the moment, or is that something we can monitor or target? We can encourage it, but how do we evaluate that in five or 10 years’ time, if we are asking whether something has been raised? Are we making sure we are accomplishing that going forward?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Paul McLennan
I will speak just to my amendment 36, which would amend the bill in relation to the provision for the SFC to appoint co-opted members. Amendment 36 is a small change that would make it clear that the terms and conditions on which co-opted members of the SFC are appointed would include any remuneration and allowances that they are to receive. I hope that the committee can support that clarification of the bill.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul McLennan
That is an ideal way to finish, convener. Thank you very much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul McLennan
I am conscious that we are probably already over time, but there are a couple of key things for me.
In your introduction, you talked about the participation strategy. When it comes down to it, the work you do is all about people and the lived experience. We can all talk about the politics and whatever else, but the work is all about people and how it impacts on their lives. A key question for me is: how can you use lived experience going forward? We have had various evidence sessions, and what really strikes me is when people tell us how something has individually impacted on them. How do you bring that lived experience into the work that you continue to do?
I agree with you that there is a role for us all. If we are talking about the broader equalities agenda, it is political, but it is political for all of us. It is obviously more so for the Government, but it is politically on all of us to make sure that we bring in lived experience. The political discourse on equalities is just awful at the moment, so can you say more about how we make the lived experience as real as possible?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul McLennan
Thank you—it is key.
My final question is: if we are sitting here five years from now and having the same kind of session, what does success look like in what the Scottish Government does, what the Parliament does and what the wider public sector does? Where do we want to get to for the Government, for Parliament and for the wider Scottish public sector?
I know that that is a big question, but what does success look like in a few key objectives? It is on all of us as Government, as parliamentarians and the wider public sector to act, and we want to be able to say, “You told us five years ago that we had to deliver on this; it is up to every single one of us to deliver for you.”
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul McLennan
Jan, would you like to add anything?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul McLennan
That is the key thing for us all and, as I said, it is a challenge that we need to accept as parliamentarians. If we are back here in five years, asking the same questions, and we have failed, it will be a failure on us all. It is not just on the Government or Parliament; it would be a failure on us all.