The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:We have all done enough projects to know that a project plan is accurate only after the completion of the project. The spreadsheet that accompanies the IDP is pretty high level. The higher the level, the bigger the variance against any initial estimates will be.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Could the variance be extremely high because the level is very high?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Does the draft strategy reflect
“a sufficiently long-term approach to infrastructure planning”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you very much for your kind comments. I would like to confirm that I am not retiring—I will just send that signal to the marketplace. In return, I thank you very much for all your efforts. I have seen some great stuff emerging over this parliamentary session.
I want to take things up a level. Obviously, we are focusing on your publication, but our conversation now has to take place in the face of the considerable uncertainty introduced by global events over the past few days. We can be pretty certain that what is happening will flow through into the economy in terms of inflation, and that there will be a short-term impact on supply chains and so on. However, there might also be a longer-term impact in terms of increased defence spending. I would appreciate your thoughts on what the impact of the situation might be. We have some models to draw on, such as what has happened as a result of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Have you started modelling scenarios? You might not have done that, but I would appreciate your thoughts, anyway.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:An end to boom and bust, I seem to remember.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Getting back to the matter in hand, I want to ask about something that Liz Smith usually brings up—the behavioural impact of fiscal drag. I know that you routinely factor that in and make an assessment of it, but have you given any further thought to the quite stark differential between Scotland and the rest of the UK with regard to the number of people who are being pulled into the higher-rate tax band? Is that increasingly becoming a concern? How are you treating it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:That was a very good point and I thank you for making it. My next question is whether
“the cost ranges and timescales provided in the accompanying excel spreadsheet are credible and deliverable”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:I asked that because I am trying to flesh something out a bit. On the face of it, this document—the IDP—has lots of things missing, and I would contend that most people will not stick it on their notice board. They will check to see what the thematics are—for example, for construction and housing generally there is a very clear thread.
However, I am trying to explore what would be the right balance, which pulls in a lot of good work that is clearly under way against the considerable uncertainty. We talked about the mutual investment model earlier. That has come on to the table and the issue goes right back to personal protective equipment, Meg Hillier and the Public Accounts Committee—get it off the balance sheet of a UK plc that is trading broke. That is where that has come from. It is probably a necessary reaction to a fundamental lack of capital, which the convener talked about.
I am trying to flesh out what you think could be added to the IDP that would make it more weighty, while fully recognising that we have a short-term environment with a year-on-year budget and that we will not be able to deliver the grand thematics that we need to deliver.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Michelle Thomson
:My general question is for everybody—I am not going to pick anyone to go first, because you are all in different stages of evolution. We always have a sort of dance in this committee—you will notice that the convener teases somebody into just pushing the dial a wee bit. I suspect that the reason for that is that, culturally, some organisations will always want to hedge what they say because they are aware that all the evidence that is given will be picked up by the Government and they do not want to step over a line. There are also sometimes internal challenges.
My question is a general one about culture. How equipped is each of your organisations to understand the potential scale of the threats that are coming down the track, which I think are deeply significant? In other words, could you go faster than Government itself is able to anticipate, and have you got that kind of push and pull? The short-termism of the political landscape that we are in—we have two electoral cycles in this Parliament—plays into what can realistically be done, and that could threaten the speed of change.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Michelle Thomson
:I would also be interested in your thoughts, Tiffany. I do not hear a great deal of recognition of those real blockers to change. We have already spoken about multiyear funding, but the political cycles also inhibit risk taking when the extent of the change that we need is risky. Does anyone want to comment on that?