The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1598 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have mentioned the concept of billable hours, as has the convener. There really is no other walk of life in which someone would charge on a billable-hours basis without some attempt at negotiation to fix the costs up front, particularly when the costs are going to be significant. Is that just precedent—is it just the way that lawyers like to operate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you very much for joining us. I, too, was intrigued by your written submission. It is worth quoting one sentence that jumped out, as it is compelling:
“It has to be recognised that inquiries are a source of substantial income for some large legal firms and as such the question arises as to the extent to which they are motivated to keep costs to a minimum and within budget.”
That is a very powerful sentence.
In preparing for this evidence session, I looked up your background and I found that you have a very long and compelling hinterland. Is there any other arena that you have dealt with, in the course of your career, where there is no cost control whatsoever although millions of pounds are involved; where the terms of reference do not ordinarily contain a budget; where there are no stage gates or phasing of the inquiry; and where there is no active monitoring? Have you ever come across that in any other walk of life in your career?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
In the inquiry that you were dealing with, how much pressure did you come under from Government to keep a lid on costs? How much active monitoring was there by Government, or was it you yourselves who were pointing that out? You mentioned that you had to go back and say, “Look—costs are going to increase.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Obviously, this morning’s session has been about the Scottish budget process in practice. In your earlier remarks, you alluded to the inefficiency of the process. If you were going to adopt a process, I certainly do not know anybody—whether the Fiscal Commission or any other organisation—who would start from this position. However, what always interests me is whether we are able to collect the cost of the inefficiencies.
You said earlier that the devolved institutions are not accorded the same respect as other Whitehall departments when it comes to projecting the UK spending review. What that means is that you will have to make some assumptions. You will have to put the time and effort into doing those and then, presumably, have to redo them when you get told the details, later on.
To what extent are you able to—or do you—collect the costs of that inefficiency in the process, or are you just continually responding to it? I think that focusing on those figures could be quite illuminating, because we all know that we have quite a difficult crisis in public sector funding generally.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
It looks like you want to come in, Victoria—am I right?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I also went to Bearsden academy, but I will not indulge myself by asking Ian Rogers which teacher he was referring to.
I want to pick up on something that Peter Proud mentioned. I completely agree with what you are saying. I did a music degree and worked as a professional musician for quite a long time. I then did a master’s in IT and ended up in project management in that sector, where I worked my way up the tree.
At that time, that was not typical, but there is now a much clearer understanding that the meta skills that people develop while doing a creative arts degree are transferable. That is my view, because I have been down that path, but I want to explore with you whether you agree with that and whether you think that that is recognised. To return to our questioning about skills provisioning, is there provision for that complex pathway, based on what you see in your software journey?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Peter Proud, I will bring you in next. You are obviously in an entirely different sector and location.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will leave it there, but I might come back in later.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
You are preaching to the converted, but my question is whether your view, which I share, is recognised? Is that flexibility and, arguably, behavioural flexibility, recognised across your sector? Is that supported by our skills provisioning?