The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:It was good that the convener brought up the point about climate change, but the other issue is technology. There are many reports emerging with amazing projections around what AI will ultimately do to the labour market and how that will flow into the wider economy. I appreciate—I have probably asked you about this before—that it is impossible to forecast that with any degree of accuracy. However, there will be a tipping point where, without giving that consideration, we are all living in an utterly meaningless bubble because there is no certainty whatsoever. How do you manage that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:You could also help me in what has ultimately been my failed mission to get the Scottish Government to routinely disaggregate and collect data by sex. It does so in many areas, but not in others.
That is me, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Good morning, and thank you for joining us. How many of the sectors referenced in the IDP, whether it be transport, economy, culture or any of the many others, do you think will have this plan on their noticeboards and will be referring to it frequently?
Ian, you looked at me, so you can answer the question. Peter was wise enough to look down.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Peter Reekie, since you looked down, we will play a wee game that I used to play with my kids. It is called the yes/no game. I anticipate that you will find it particularly difficult, but bear with me. My colleague John Mason picked up a question about sufficient detail. The point of this evidence session, as explained in the committee’s meeting papers, is that it
“is intended to provide a snapshot of how the IDP has been received amongst key sectors”.
I will ask about a few of the points mentioned in the paper. Just give me a yes or a no; I just want to get a flavour. The first bullet point is about whether
“the IDP provides certainty for project planning, private sector investment, innovation and skills development, to support economic growth”.
Does it do that—yes or no? The idea of certainty is a key point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Yes. Were you surprised that, for example, the prioritisation is asserted rather than demonstrated—that there is no interdependency assessment and no look at integration, prioritisation, sequencing, capacity assessment, risk management, metrics, spatial strategies, supply chain considerations, governance and so on? Might you have expected to see any of that in the plan?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:You can have the final word, Ian.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Indeed. I could not agree more.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:Either way, the effects will not be good and will add to an already constrained situation in a number of different areas.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:That leads me to my final question. You talked at the start about my pushing on diversity; I did a routine keyword search of your report and I noticed that the word “women” is mentioned once, “disability” is mentioned 28 times, and “child” is mentioned 40 times. It was a bit hard to search for “ageing”, because you use different terms.
Thinking about the challenges that we face—particularly with the cuts to health and social care, which we know will have a disproportionate impact on women, given their caring roles, how many are in those sorts of professions, the poverty effects and so on—I have to wonder why we are blind when it comes to any such data in your report. I have highlighted this issue before, but can you tell me what your rationale is in that respect? I would like to understand it. Moreover, might you consider doing something about that in future, given the disproportionate impact that we are seeing in certain emerging scenarios? I do not think that your report gives us that data or that insight, which I am sure that you have.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michelle Thomson
:I can—on balance and all things considered. Seriously, I am just trying to get a flavour.