The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1598 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I presume that, within that, there was active consideration of where potential conflicts of interest might occur.
People say that the good thing about Scotland is that everybody knows everybody and that the bad thing about Scotland is that everybody knows everybody. I imagine that it is similar in Jersey. It sounds as though Jersey was very aware of the potential for conflicts of interest where there were existing relationships that might be mutually beneficial.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I think that we will.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
And therefore money.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. I just have a couple of wee questions, because most areas have been covered.
I visited the Legislative Assembly of Alberta recently. For your information, all oil and gas receipts accrue to the Alberta Government’s balance sheet, and it has no limitations whatsoever on its borrowing powers. Perhaps it is a matter of education for members in this Parliament—perhaps even for this committee—why that would be a good thing. Seriously, particularly when we think about capital borrowing provisioning and how the Scottish Parliament compares with other areas and jurisdictions, there is a general ignorance in this Parliament as to the considerably higher number of powers that there are in other jurisdictions—and, critically, what is able to be done with those powers.
Do you think that it might be helpful for people to understand a bit more about that? I do not want to go off topic and get a row from the convener, but those powers must surely serve a purpose, and that purpose must be to grow the economy.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is inefficient.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
It is about the principle.
You comment in your submission about the further cost of redacting statements and allude to the fact that that is very expensive. It would be useful, given that we are at the start of our inquiry, if you could set out why that is so expensive. Is it simply about time?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
To go back to the convener’s earlier comment, we have seen examples of lawyers acting on behalf of clients making a call in the media—which can be vigorous—for a public inquiry. One can take the view either that the lawyers are doing the right thing for their clients or, alternatively, that they understand that the opening of a public inquiry means that their costs are going to be covered by the Government of the day.
I know that your experience was with Jersey, but are you aware of any checks and balances in the process whereby people think, “Wait a minute—if this action goes to a public inquiry, it is, in effect, a licence to print money”? Were you subjected to checks and balances, or was it you yourselves who were putting the checks and balances in place?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have one last wee question. One of the people who gave us evidence commented on the unintended impact of what was called the Maxwellisation process, whereby somebody in the report had the opportunity to have early sight of the report and seek modifications to it. To what extent could that affect the outcome?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
How has that been received?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Particularly if there is a shared endeavour around post-Brexit economic growth.