The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
A question that would often be asked in such a case is who would benefit from any course of action. An example that I gave involved someone calling for an increase in the scope of a public inquiry while, at the same time, representing the core participants and therefore potentially being a significant beneficiary. As you say, that can often simply be about perception. We know that the chair can choose to take action, but are you aware of any formalised process that allows those questions to be asked?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is the point that I am getting at. There could be a situation in which the chair would determine which lawyer would represent the core participants. I have already pointed out that who becomes a core participant is subject to criteria, but I think that you have confirmed the issue for me.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
It is useful to know that the question of querying the costs for lawyers who represent core participants does not apply to you. Obviously, I am in no way inferring anything by asking the question, but the fact that costs, even if they were detailed, were not subsequently queried could suggest a throwaway acceptance of “Yes, that’s fine.” I am trying to get a sense of how actively the costs are monitored, in comparison with an implicit process—as part of the culture of how inquiries operate—of, “Well, an eminent KC submitting this, so of course it’s right. It’s all detailed and that’s good enough for us.” Would it be fair to say that costs from eminent KCs are usually accepted because that is the culture?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Michael Clancy, in your submission, you said that
“inquiries are not-for-profit bodies.”
Can you explain what you mean by that? I take it that you mean that it is in their nature that they are not for profit, because it is clear that a lot of money flows through them.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will interrupt you there. I just wanted to check that point about inquiries being not for profit because, clearly, quite a lot of profit is being made.
With the earlier panel—I know that Richard Pugh joined us later during that—we discussed the general theme of inquiries being seen as, in effect, a type of project that have different pathways through them. There could be properly scoped terms of reference, with an indication of a budget—even if that was then subject to change control, as would be normal—and with reporting. Potentially, there could be the equivalent of a project management office.
To what extent is that feasible? Does any of you accord with the view that that route would not be effective only in the case of public inquiries? That approach is not perfect in businesses or in any other public sector piece of work.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am keen to let my colleagues come in. I know that we only have you for an hour, so this is my final question.
What commitment can you give today about the Acorn carbon capture and storage project? There has been some extensive pre-trailing that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is going cold on Acorn specifically but continuing to proceed with Teeside and Humberside. Can you give us any update or commitment on the Acorn project?
09:15Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
You are the accountable—
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
At a recent meeting of the Scottish Affairs Committee, Ineos was unable to signal its intention to invest in project willow, despite being invited to do so. You are correct about the scale of the projects under project willow not yet being on the table, but the problem is that they will not come unless there is regulatory certainty and investment certainty. The regulatory certainty will come from the UK Government, and Ineos clearly has a role, because it owns the land. I ask you for your reflections on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay—I will move on to the next question, then.