The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1505 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Do you have any final words, Susan?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
My couple of questions will help to bring that in. I have a quick question that I will invite Susan Love to answer first. How do you see the advent of artificial intelligence affecting skills provision in the future and what active thinking are you doing on that? We are talking about a very wide landscape and we do not know what we do not know but, as I have said previously, there is a juggernaut coming down the track and we need to try to factor it in in some way. Could you give me some reflections as to what you have thought about thus far? If you have not thought about it, that is also okay.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I appreciate that AI is a massive area. I am not at all surprised and I am entirely heartened to hear about the amount of work that is going on in your sector.
The reason why I am asking about this is to probe the Scottish Government’s work mapping a pathway that ensures skills provisioning across the piece and its ability to take cognisance of AI across the piece. Are you getting the sense, as we talk about the skills landscape and, in effect, being fit for the future, that consideration of AI is very much on the table in the way that it is in what you have outlined about your sector?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. I will bring in the other three panellists with my next question, and then give you a chance, Susan.
I have been listening very intently to this wide-ranging session and part of the committee’s challenge is how to fashion recommendations. If I were to be cruel and ask what your top two asks are in terms of ensuring that our skills system works and is fit for the future of your sector, what would those top two asks be? You are smiling, Kellie. You have to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Exactly.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Ian, do you want to come in? [Interruption.] You are on silent.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay.
I will quickly pick up on your climate change report. I know that we have already covered that a wee bit, but you may recall that I was impressed by that targeted focus on a specific policy area. Do you intend to refresh that report? I know that we have talked about other policy areas as well, but what is your intention with that work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is helpful.
The main gist of what I want to ask, which will probably not come as a surprise to you, is about your annual report on diversity and inclusion. I do not want to sound a little rude but, to be honest, it read to me as saying that you were definitely going to do something at some point but that that point is undetermined in terms of specific dates or saying that you are going to take action X by this date. It would be useful if you could walk me through your plans.
I appreciate that there are constraints; I appreciate the environment and economics and so on. However, let us start from board level and take it down. My particular concern is about giving representation to 51 per cent of the population, whose voices we simply do not hear.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thanks for joining us. I will follow on from the convener’s commentary about the challenge of building and sustaining MSPs’ knowledge of—and the critical importance of understanding—where money is coming from, where it is going and the wriggle room therein.
Given your slight underspend on staff costs, have you ever thought about consulting with a public affairs company? I appreciate that, as a public body, you probably do not want to be in the business of paying a very expensive company on an on-going basis, but it might be possible to get one to set up an initial strategy that you could then run with. I appreciate the complex challenge of messaging.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have one last wee question on a different area before I hand back to the convener.
I know that it is always hard to get a picture of risk assessment with annual reports, because they represent a fixed point in time, but I did not really get a sense of the dynamic flow of the probability of a risk occurring and I found it hard to grasp. I do not know whether you have thought about how you would represent that. I appreciate that what is in the report is fixed, but there is nothing on the probability of such an occurrence.