The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1887 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am not a lawyer and I am not claiming any expertise, but my simple view is that, if the framing of some legislation, even though it is simple, ticks the box that either protects people when something happens or engenders confidence for further activity—although it is quite light touch and I know that the situation is more complex than that—that is not necessarily a bad thing. I have expressed that simplistically, but I am trying to explore this. I used immutability and AI simply as an example—there may be other considerations—but what I am trying to explore from a legal perspective is whether the bill has the right touch.
Also, this is a slightly different thread, but the Faculty of Advocates consultation response referred to value and the fact that the provision on that should not be worded in the negative in the bill. I wanted to pick that up with you, but perhaps we can stay on the other question for now.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
It could be the first that some of us have heard.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have given a very clear and comprehensive explanation, so thank you very much.
To bring in Professor Yüksel Ripley and Dr MacPherson, I want to get a sense of whether the bill’s framing as it is currently documented is in the right place.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am always open minded enough to hear more about AI.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Mr Tariq, the faculty’s commentary is that the bill’s good-faith provision is expressed in the negative and you would rather see it expressed in the positive, but I want to flesh that out a bit more.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is very useful. Thank you very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is good.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
Peter Ferry, I have not given you a chance to come in. Do you have any final reflections before I hand back to the convener?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
The reason I am asking about this goes back to the comments made earlier by the convener. While I was listening to that exchange, I, too, was struggling to understand from point A to point B where you anticipate you will be N per cent completed on whatever scheme or whatever circumstances and, therefore, the interim staging points. Are you stepping through at that level of detail with Mr McKee? Listening to that exchange, I did not really have any increased confidence of the probability of you meeting those deadlines without understanding the probability of the interim deadlines, if I am making myself clear. Are you able to step through that with Mr McKee, or is he so busy—I imagine he is extraordinarily busy—just taking the endpoint without interrogating the interim points?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
Given that the people who are most interested in watching this session or, indeed, in attending it are the ones who have not yet derived satisfaction, I gently suggest that they are probably less confident about the issues that we have pulled out—particularly the perennially moving date for when things will be completed.
You touched on it a little bit earlier, but I would like to hear you walk through what you will do. Knowing what you know now, what would you do differently?
11:15