The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1769 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay.
You might not be able to give much commentary on this, but I have noticed that the Government’s intention to have the tax point near point of sale works to an extent, but that excludes build-to-rent properties. Obviously, that is an entirely different business model. Do you have any reflections on the fact that it will not work for build-to-rent, by its very nature?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
In your submission, you commented that the levy could ultimately reduce supply and that hotels could take priority, although that would be in certain areas, where there would be evidence of demand. Are you still concerned that it could reduce housing supply, given squeezed margins, in rural areas in particular?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
As per the English regs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
The poor had no lawyers, if you like.
I turn to Mr Drummond. SPVs will be used, and there could be cases where unscrupulous builders set up multiple SPVs. To allude to Mr Henderson’s point, it would become very costly to track that back at some point in the future. How realistically can that practice be stopped and tracked with the powers, given that the regulation of such business structures resides with Westminster?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
My last question is for Jonathan Henderson. You had quite an exchange earlier with the convener about why we are where we are, in which you mentioned a whole-system approach. You also alluded to the need for culture change in your submission. To what extent—if at all—do you think that the levy might start that process, or does the issue go much deeper than that?
09:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
Do you want to make any comments, Peter?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
Convener, I reference my entry in the register of members’ interests.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
There are quite a few points to pick up on, but let me be absolutely clear. You see it as appropriate to do your campaigning—we accept that, when an issue has come to light, campaigning is absolutely legitimate; nobody has any issue with that—through the mechanisms of the Parliament, including the public petitions committee, which you mentioned, and through members, in order to create that groundswell of opinion, instead of going direct to the media. What are your reflections, from an ethical perspective within the legal profession, on a situation in which a lawyer who is a close friend of a Government minister is able to use that route to seek a public inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
Yes, Michael Clancy said that it was unclear whether a lawyer would be exercising their freedom of speech. Compass Chambers said that it would not represent a conflict of interest if the lawyer was advancing their client’s position.
I will link it to the financial element. Lawyers will be advocating for their client’s position. We could make a case that the more successfully they advocate for that position over the maximum length of time, the more appealing it is for them. The convener has already raised our perception of the lack of financial controls. A lawyer could attach themselves to an inquiry that they were able to trigger through successful use of the media. If the inquiry was on-going for a long period of time and the lawyer potentially sought to extend its scope, thereby increasing the length of time that the inquiry would take, the result would be huge fees for the lawyer concerned, which is an appealing position. Can you understand from a public perception point of view why that sort of example would pique the committee’s interest and, ultimately affect the perception of the success or desirability of public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is good to hear. That is heartening for the committee, notwithstanding the huge sums that have been spent thus far.