The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1598 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
We can see how that would work for the law firms that are involved as part of the prevailing culture of how we do inquiries. Because they are done in that way, the law firms that are most likely to get the work are—guess what?—the ones that can claim previous experience, so it becomes self-perpetuating. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. We have talked a lot about costs and governance. My first question is for you, Mary, given that you have been involved in a multitude of things across the NHS in your role. Are you involved in any pieces of work that do not have any governance or properly monitor costs in the way that you have set out?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
We are aware that other bodies have looked at the running of inquiries. I mentioned the House of Lords earlier, but you mostly face into the Cabinet Office, as you said. From your perspective, is there an appetite on the part of the UK Government to look properly at this? Clearly, things are now completely out of hand. Is there an appetite to look to change it? That would potentially involve annoying some law firms that are on this pretty lucrative path.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am interested in the culture. Mary Morgan, it was interesting that you said that, until you were preparing for this evidence session, you had not realised that there could be other, different types of inquiries. You thought that they were all judge led and statutory.
Rebecca McKee, from your perspective, how did we get here? It is as if everybody is a winner when people and politicians demand an inquiry—lawyers are happy because they make a lot of money, and the Government is happy because it has made the issue go away. However, it is a long time until we know whether the people who were greatly affected by the issue at hand are happy—that could be years down the line. Culturally, how on earth did we get to the point that we are at today, based on your work and the research you have been doing?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. Thank you very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Before the other witnesses come in, I have another question for you. You referred to the use of LBTT. Is the current situation not simply a function of the fact that there are hardly any taxes that Scotland can raise? I completely agree with you about the need to increase the money flowing through the economy, but in some respects, is not LBTT just the low-hanging fruit that the Scottish Government can utilise in the absence of other taxes?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. Simon, do you have any final comments on the range of questions that I have asked?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning and thank you for joining us.
David Phillips, as you are still on screen, I will keep you there. We have talked a lot in general terms about productivity, and I think that we all understand the factors that drive it. However, I am thinking about relative weighting within those factors—for example, economic multipliers in major infrastructure and housing projects. What is your sense of the relative weighting across all the factors that influence productivity? What would give productivity a significant boost?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Bridgette Wessels might like to come in next. In opening out the conversation, I am interested in the historical impacts of low investment in capital projects and infrastructure. That has been a historical issue in the UK for 30-odd years. What are your thoughts about how that has ultimately affected productivity, given that we know that infrastructure projects, even if they are temporary, can often turn things around a bit?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. It was worth confirming that, because that is a useful detail. Thank you.