The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1515 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
Before we hear from others, do you think that, if the SNIB is fundamentally constrained to operating in areas of market failure, that could—from a risk perspective—have a cooling-off effect for the bank? Obviously, the bank’s risk assessments will be tightly honed, given the nature of what it is doing.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
I see that George Peretz wants to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
I am keen for others to have the chance to respond. The point that we started with is that, first and foremost, the detail to establish a scheme needs to be in place, and it appears that that detail, whether specifically for the SNIB as regards its role in relation to market failure and beyond, is not yet clearly established.
I am aware that other members want to come in, but before I give way to them, perhaps Professor Fothergill or Mr Heddle would like to respond to my question about the SNIB.
Economy and Fair Work Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
Good morning, everybody. We have received quite a few submissions about the bill’s potential impact on economic development. In his submission, Professor Bell points out the difference between horizontal and vertical development. It is perhaps a matter of regret that we do not have a representative of the Scottish National Investment Bank on the panel. As you will be aware, the SNIB involves an investment by the Scottish Government of £2 billion over 10 years, which is a serious amount of public money. In its submission, the bank says:
“It goes without saying that if development banks are to be constrained to operating in areas of market failure, the new UK Subsidy Control Regime must be at least as wide as its predecessor, and/or sufficient discretion to public bodies and devolved administrations afforded.”
I want to get your views on the Scottish National Investment Bank in particular, as it seems to be a slightly different model, given that it was set up specifically to aid economic development in Scotland in a key way, not least on net zero. I imagine that, if that is the case for the SNIB, it will also be an issue for the British Business Bank. Perhaps Professor Fothergill or Professor Bell might like to answer in the first instance.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
I can see that David Phillips wants to come in. He has put an R in the chat box.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
I have a question for all three of the Davids, but perhaps Professor David Bell could start. We have focused on Scotland and Wales, but I am interested in what helpful precedents operate elsewhere in the world, particularly those that deal with issues around fiscal transfers and divergence over time. I feel as though we are dancing on the head of a pin, particularly in relation to indexation methods, and some of those problems are not unique. I would appreciate some thoughts from Professor Bell on that in relation to the review.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
Earlier, we talked about how one could grow the tax base—in other words, the working-age population—in Scotland. Daniel Johnson mentioned that, the committee has talked about it a great deal, and I would like to understand the issue a bit more.
Professor Bell, in your view, what are the limitations on the fiscal levers that the Scottish Government currently has to influence and grow the tax base, regardless of the indexation method? Of course, we are really looking at the working-age population. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on the current limitations in the area that we are discussing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
To what extent does the Barnett formula embed structural imbalances in the UK? You mentioned financial services, which is an industry that I was involved in for many years. Over the course of my career, head office functions moved to London, bar a few noteworthy examples such as Standard Life, although things have changed for it as well.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
I thank Ed Poole and Guto Ifan for their submission. I echo the sentiments of everyone else on the committee: it really is excellent.
How have the different BGAs per income tax band been beneficial for Wales, given what you have outlined about the difference in your tax base? What are the primary benefits of that system going forward in the light of post-Brexit immigration restrictions?
That is quite a general question. It is fine for whoever wants to answer to do it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.