The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1691 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
That would be helpful, and I know that you will carefully qualify any data that you provide.
Are you aware of any overlap of outcomes that might lend themselves to consideration for streamlining from an audit perspective? Perhaps I should ask when you last audited the 129 bodies’ effectiveness across the board.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
Does either Charlotte Barbour or the Auditor General have anything to add?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
It will be interesting.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
I appreciate that it is difficult.
Susan Murray, you made a comment, with which I agree strongly, about there being
“greater potential for using procurement as a tool to drive change.”
You make a broad suggestion in your submission, but will you give us a wee bit more flavour of your thinking? You simply mention
“standard environmental and social policy criteria”.
Will you give us a few more examples? The suggestion interests me.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
Arguably, then, you are suggesting that there should be more transparency and that there needs to be linkage to various outcomes.
I do not know whether the Auditor General wants to come in on that point. It strikes me as an interesting area.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
I will try to be brief. I have a couple of questions. In your submission, you mention wider adoption of shared services and correctly note that that will need increased resources and time to take effect. It also needs appetite. Can you help me to understand the standard functions that are normally part of shared services—that is, finance, HR and IT? Are there any genuinely shared services across all 32 local councils?
17:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
I get why that is the case. Have there been terms of reference for the review?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
I have seen the document that was published in May.
To go back to your point, Kirsty Flanagan, sometimes we see facilities management, for example, being part of a shared services function. I accept what you said about the disparate geography of Argyll and Bute, but you have also pointed out that there is a lack of appetite across councils in respect of replicated functions—for example, finance directors, IT, HR and the specialisms. In any other commercial walk of life—I spent some time in commerce in a previous life—there is no way that there would be duplicated functions across the board. Hence my comment about appetite. On the one hand, councils complain about not having any money; on the other hand, it is clear that that is an area that should be looked at, as there are duplicated functions across 32 councils.
That is the point that I am trying to make, although I accept that there is the time issue and a cost.
I want to ask Kirsty Flanagan one more question. It is a bit of a technical question, so I hope that we can deal with it quite quickly.
You made a point in the submission about capital accounting. I know that that has been rumbling about for some time. Obviously, there are concerns about the planned review, but what was the driver for the concern? That issue has been raised a number of times, and something is now being done about it—it is being looked at. Surely a potential outcome is a positive one. I want to understand where your concerns are coming from and the assumption that the result could end up less favourable for councils.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Michelle Thomson
I will not labour the point, because I am conscious of the time; however, I am just not clear why you think that that will automatically happen. That is what I am querying.