The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1970 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
I hear what you are saying but, again, there is a conundrum. Appropriately, you call to a higher power—that the issue involves public funds—and you seek to put your view that it would be appropriate for the inquiry to be brought to a conclusion. However, the Government thereby runs the risk of accusations of meddling in the independence of the chair. I cannot see how that circle can be squared within the current legislation and provisions.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
You are being clear but we are not comparing apples with apples. I am not suggesting that there will be another £26.2 million of costs; I am suggesting that it is the right of the chair—and I do not want to labour this point—to make an assessment of the evidence that has been gathered thus far. I am not suggesting that the entire thing would be run again but there is at least the possibility that they might wish to further interrogate certain pockets of it. That, as a minimum, is a possibility. I am pointing out that, in terms of cost control and accountability, the conflict of interest at the heart of the 2005 act is largely unresolvable.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much for that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. I will open this out to both of you, given that Steve Aitken has a very established company. I would like to finish off by exploring what you see as the critical factors in terms of skills and the ecosystem that have enabled you to operate as you do and which, critically, could enable Scotland to compete globally in this area. If we think of other industries, we cannot compete in certain areas at scale, but this is an area where we can compete. I ask Steve to answer that first. I have looked at your background, so I know what it is.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Good morning. I thank both our witnesses for joining us. I will come to you first, Leo. Originally, our papers showed that Ziyad, who I think is a partner of yours, was to appear for Mamba Sounds, but I think that you are appearing under a different company name today. It would be useful, first of all, to understand what you are doing in the AI space and why, and what has brought you to this point.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
It makes complete sense. This session follows our earlier session with Kayla-Megan Burns, who is a board member specialising in AI for the Royal Scottish National Orchestra. It would be useful to understand the scale of the problem and the implications for the people in the artistic sector of fraudulent activity around their material.
We also heard from Dex Hunter-Torricke in our earlier session, who said that he could see the possibility of one person operating a company that would have turnover of $1 billion with effective utilisation of AI.
It would be useful to understand the scale of the problem, where you see yourself operating and why you think that the new product that you are looking at could fit into that niche.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. I will hand back to the convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
There was so much in that answer. Working on the basis that, almost regardless of what people do, it will already be too late, I get the sense from what you are saying that we should not get in the way of the disrupters who will manage to create sole-employee, billion-dollar companies. However, when it comes to the utilisation of AI in the public sector, trust is a much bigger consideration. In the context of some of the use cases that the public sector deals with, getting it wrong could have catastrophic consequences with regard not only to the data, but to society’s trust in government and all that that entails.
I would appreciate your thoughts on that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
We could unpick so much in that; that is our challenge with such a short, sharp and focused series of sessions.
I would like to get reflections from both of you on another point. About 10 years ago, when I was in Westminster, we talked about AI in a session with a professor from the University of Cambridge. At that point, it seemed unbelievable how many base functions of lawyers and accountants were going to be taken over, although we know that to be true now.
When I asked that professor what skill set was going to inherit the earth, his answer was that the creatives will keep on creating no matter what, and they will harness the power of AI to endlessly create—and that will be the merging point. That has always stuck with me, and I would appreciate hearing your reflections on it. Do you believe that that is true? What does it mean for how we fundamentally shape the provisioning of everything, from a governance perspective?
I will first come back to Dex Hunter-Torricke and finish with Kayla-Megan Burns, and that will be me done, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you. I put the same question to Kayla-Megan Burns.