The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1608 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have mentioned providers such as colleges, but do you feel that there is a clear way for your trade body to be able to influence and shape policies such as the new deal for business? Are you clear about how you can take part in the shaping of those policies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much.
Jack Norquoy, I said that I would give you a chance to come back in, because we moved on to talking about AI. Obviously, net zero is your bag, but do you want to add any final reflections?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
To pick up on that, for the record, can you give us an example today—it is always useful to furnish an example—that we can reflect in our deliberations?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
Okay. I have a final question to finish off this topic. We have covered the gamut of all the various documents. It is incredibly complex and difficult to align all of those. We also have the UK spending review, as you correctly commented. Based on your experience thus far, how confident are you that, particularly with future projections in these really challenging times, things can be brought into line with the clarity and purpose that we are all seeking?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I have a last wee question. The convener mentioned disability prevalence. Do you have any sense as to why there is that prevalence? The issue has come up in the committee previously, but the projected increase seems quite astounding.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I agree. I ask that question because one of the challenges is the complexity of the fiscal framework. I try to explain it to people. They ask a straight question and I desperately try not to sound like a politician by saying, “It depends.” I then need to explain in a simple way why it depends, by which point I have inevitably lost them. I would like to hear your comments on that.
The Scottish Fiscal Commission is doing considerably more work now, and it is welcome to point out the issues with the UK’s fiscal sustainability. If you understand anything about the fiscal framework, you will understand that there is a critical dependency on the UK’s fiscal sustainability. What thought have you given to that? If you understand the fiscal framework and fiscal sustainability, you will understand that you cannot have one without the other. I appreciate that you provide the audit and that that is different—I get that—but I would like to hear some reflections on what consideration you are giving to the wider economic environment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
As is the nature of these things, many of the questions that I was going to ask have been covered, so I will just pick up on a couple of points.
Let us go back to the question about how effective current political engagement is. I know that there has been a discussion about that already, but I would like to gently challenge you on why you chose to refer to the Scottish Human Rights Commission’s contribution instead of giving your own view as the Auditor General. Does that mean that you do not have a view, or is it that you just could not think of anything?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
A lot of this has been covered, but—I do not want to put words in your mouth—you view the national performance framework as the most accessible way in which ordinary members of the public can grasp the thematics of this and what that means for them. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I suspect that that is a better explanation than mine.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michelle Thomson
I notice that the Scottish Fiscal Commission has slightly rephrased its terminology, probably to recognise that critical dependency.
Let us return to the question that Craig Hoy asked about people having a better understanding of the Scottish Government’s cost base. Does the Government have an understanding of its cost base? To go back to the point that John Mason made earlier, it is politically unpalatable to reflect an understanding of that cost base, so it probably seems better to keep schtum. Are you just being kind by saying that the Government does not have an understanding of its cost base?
10:30