The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1970 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
Peter Ferry may want to come in, but I will bring in Jamie Gray first, to reflect on this area from a legal perspective. Part of your role involves being cognisant of risk and speaking to your clients about that.
On balance, therefore, all things considered—we have considered a lot of things thus far—do you think that the bill, simple though it is, and we understand why that is the case, will enhance economic opportunity? In other words, when you walk your clients through a risk assessment, will you have increased confidence that the law is protecting them?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
I will ask about a couple of areas. We have had quite a prolonged discussion about getting the balance right. The genesis, if you like, of the bill is in good legal principles, yet it is attempting to bolt something on that is highly complex and moving at pace with developments in technology.
One of the scenarios that I posed picked up the convener’s point about immutability and where autogenerated AI comes to the fore where, instead of someone changing something in the ledger, you have a thing changing a thing in the ledger. I do not want to go into detail to the nth degree on AI, but what I was trying to explore with the previous panel of witnesses was whether we have the framing of the bill right in terms of immutability, because that is a fundamental principle that is understood in law, but it is crashing into technology. I am using that as an example. Have we got the balance right? Do we need to go deeper, in guidance or understanding, or are we happy to let things evolve? I know that that is quite an open question—do not all rush at once. Dr Patrick, you smiled at me, so you can go first.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am not a lawyer and I am not claiming any expertise, but my simple view is that, if the framing of some legislation, even though it is simple, ticks the box that either protects people when something happens or engenders confidence for further activity—although it is quite light touch and I know that the situation is more complex than that—that is not necessarily a bad thing. I have expressed that simplistically, but I am trying to explore this. I used immutability and AI simply as an example—there may be other considerations—but what I am trying to explore from a legal perspective is whether the bill has the right touch.
Also, this is a slightly different thread, but the Faculty of Advocates consultation response referred to value and the fact that the provision on that should not be worded in the negative in the bill. I wanted to pick that up with you, but perhaps we can stay on the other question for now.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
It could be the first that some of us have heard.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
You have given a very clear and comprehensive explanation, so thank you very much.
To bring in Professor Yüksel Ripley and Dr MacPherson, I want to get a sense of whether the bill’s framing as it is currently documented is in the right place.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
I am always open minded enough to hear more about AI.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
Thank you.
Mr Tariq, the faculty’s commentary is that the bill’s good-faith provision is expressed in the negative and you would rather see it expressed in the positive, but I want to flesh that out a bit more.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is very useful. Thank you very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
That is good.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Michelle Thomson
Peter Ferry, I have not given you a chance to come in. Do you have any final reflections before I hand back to the convener?