The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1604 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Karen Adam
Good morning, everyone. I am Karen Adam MSP.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Karen Adam
Yes. I find what you are saying about the need to reach out to these communities to be really interesting; indeed, Afam mentioned that the communities are there and that the door is open. It is important to note that it is up to us to make that effort.
You might have already covered my second question slightly. The witnesses in the committee’s scrutiny process have said that one of the challenges is to understand the impact of committees on the budget. Indeed, the committee’s own work has shown the value of increasing participation in the process, but that doing so is resource intensive and time consuming, especially given the lack of public awareness of the budget process.
That is the preamble—here is the question. How will you work with colleagues to promote participation by ensuring that budget documentation more effectively demonstrates the changes and decisions that have been made as a result of committee scrutiny? We are transparent and the information is there, but how can we ensure that that information is understandable and digestible?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Karen Adam
Thank you all for your questions. I am going to be asking the question on behalf of Afam. Is there anything that I need to keep in mind while asking that question? I am particularly going to be focusing on participation.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Karen Adam
Thank you—that is really helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Karen Adam
That was really fascinating—thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Karen Adam
What is the current state of play with marine funding after Brexit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Karen Adam
It has been reported today that the European Commission has imposed a fine of £5.6 million following a 2020 audit’s uncovering of failures in how the Scottish Government was administering common agricultural policy fund payments to Scottish farmers. Where will the money to pay that fine come from?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2023
Karen Adam
Good morning, cabinet secretary. The programme for government said that a science and innovation strategy for marine and freshwater environments will be published. Will that have budgetary implications for Scottish Government-funded science?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Karen Adam
I would like to get some examples, if possible, that paint a picture of where you feel mainstreaming has not worked to tackle inequalities and to reach human rights aspirations. Would people’s participation in those areas have helped us to gain a better understanding of the impacts of policy making and would it have made a difference?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Karen Adam
The cabinet secretary clearly set out at the beginning of her speech the targets that Douglas Lumsden is asking about. The next part of my speech might be valuable to him.
Not every Scottish Conservative kept quiet in response to the Prime Minister’s statement. It is not often that I say this, but Maurice Golden was right: the Prime Minister’s decision last week was indeed
“a regressive move that isn’t only damaging environmentally but economically and socially too. It drags net zero into the territory of culture wars.”
What a shame that the leader of the Scottish Tories cannot bring himself to say the same.
In the words of my son, who is in his 20s,
“it’s extremely shortsighted and indicative of Tory politicians’ inability to see past the end of their terms, they don’t care about the consequences because, by the time they come around, they’ll be long gone and have pocketed the gains already.”
The latest move is another glaring example of the Tories’ lack of urgency in the fight for our planet. It took more than a decade for the UK Government finally to announce support for the Scottish Cluster’s Acorn carbon capture project in my constituency. That came only after the project missed out on the track 1 funding back in 2021, which the Tories instead granted to two projects in the north of England—which was a purely political decision. We should make no mistake about it: along with Rishi Sunak’s roll-back of climate objectives, that shows a clear pattern of behaviour, by virtue of his having thrown responsibilities to our planet under the bus for some cheap votes.