The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1489 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Karen Adam
We welcome our second panel of witnesses. Professor Katie Boyle is chair of human rights law and social justice at the University of Strathclyde school of law, and Dr Ben Christman is legal director at the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland. Thank you for attending today.
We will go straight into questions, and I will kick us off. Will you explain the accessible, affordable, timely and effective framework and the role that access to justice plays in supporting action on human rights breaches?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Karen Adam
Would the witnesses like to say anything that they have not said so far?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Karen Adam
Are members content that they have asked everything that they wished to ask?
Members: Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Karen Adam
Thank you. That brings our first session to a close, and I suspend the meeting briefly while we change over witnesses.
10:35 Meeting suspended.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Karen Adam
When you come into Parliament as a new MSP, you are presented with emails from people asking to be elected as DPO, and you have to undertake scrutiny of those individuals to know and understand them a bit better, which will, in turn, inform your decision as to whom to vote for. That gives a bit of an insight as to why it might be best for those who know the individuals better to make that decision.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Karen Adam
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Karen Adam
On the point about induction and training, and the experience that members can bring to committees, I think that there is a part for political parties to play prior to members being elected and coming to the Scottish Parliament. That education should begin at the vetting stage and continue when candidates are in place. The understanding of how our democratic institution works is beneficial to all of society anyway, but it is important that people have that basic knowledge in the first place, before they get to Parliament.
Induction, training and on-going professional development are very helpful. Often, we look at a bill for a good few weeks and then we step in to do a bit of post-legislative scrutiny, so the hat that we wear changes, and we have to shift focus. On-going skills development is helpful for everybody on committees.
Emotional intelligence is also important, as is knowing how to recognise the effectiveness of respectful scrutiny—that is how we get the best from the witnesses. A rounded approach to training and induction, both pre-election and on-going when members are here, is important to ensure that we have the most effective committees.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Karen Adam
There would be limitations with smaller committees. There may be a smaller pool of diverse voices to hear from. An inquiry that was done at Westminster found that the most effective committees had between six and 12 members, because that gives the best diversity of views. The gender-sensitive audit that the Scottish Parliament did showed that it is equally important to take into consideration the need to have a broad range of views from women’s perspectives as well.
My concern would be that, with a smaller committee, we might be cancelling out voices that could have an input that would improve not only scrutiny overall but the outcomes for people. We need that proportional representation as much as possible, in every possible respect. I know that, in reality, that can be hard to achieve, but we should be reaching for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Karen Adam
Yes, of course. I will take the party hat off.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Karen Adam
We already have the flexibility for committees to sit twice a week if they wish to. Previously, my committee has met in the evenings, and we have had away days and work programme planning days. The committees framework already allows us the flexibility to do that; it is for the conveners and committee members to discuss whether they would like to do it. They can already decide to set aside specific weekdays on which to scrutinise bills.