The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 991 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Marie McNair
That was mentioned by the witnesses in last week’s session as well.
I see that Marsha Scott wants to come in—that is no problem.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you. I really appreciate your answer.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
Thank you.
Convener, in the interests of time, I will hand back to you, unless other witnesses in the room want to come in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
That is absolutely brutal. I thought that the figure was 250,000, but thank you, Chris Birt, for clarifying that it is 400,000. It is not just numbers; there are real people behind that. Chris, some of your briefings have been really helpful, as are the case studies that you provided. Fiona Collie touched on similar ones.
The example that I was looking at was a single person losing PIP in the health element of universal credit. It would mean that they would get £818 less a month, which is equivalent to a reduction of £10,000 a year. Can you provide further examples of how people have been impacted and how it will affect those who are in work?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
It is great to have you all with us this morning. The disability charity Scope has said that the reforms could push 250,000, I think, people into poverty, including 50,000 children. Do the witnesses agree with that assessment? I will open that up to whomever wants to come in first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
Have carers in Scotland been consulted on the proposed cuts?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
Good morning to the witnesses. I found that discussion about split payments helpful. In reading our Scottish Parliament information centre paper, I was struck by the small number of households involved—in 2024, it was 15 in Scotland and 324 in the UK overall. That is totally understandable, now that you have talked about the complexity that is involved.
I will stay on the subject of universal credit. In last week’s session, I asked the witnesses a similar question. As Erica Young just spoke about, an advance of universal credit up to 100 per cent can be given, and is obviously repayable in full. If the repayment advances remain part of the system that emerges from the UK Government review, should the case be made that, in all domestic abuse cases, advances should not be repayable? Would you be okay with that, Erica?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
The two-child limit is causing major financial hardship. How common is it for families who are impacted by domestic abuse to be hit by the two-child policy?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Marie McNair
I want to go back to the assessment. I understand that the existing assessment of whether someone has limited capability for work or work-related activity includes consideration of whether the claimant would be a risk to themselves or others in the workplace. I believe that that consideration will not exist after the changes. Would having no assessment of the claimant’s ability in the workplace undermine the suggestion that the changes are about helping more people into work?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Marie McNair
Good morning. Aaliya Seyal, it is good to see you again, in a different committee.
The Scottish Government has proposed introducing block fees for legal work involving adults with incapacity. I am keen to hear your views on that. Earlier, you touched on your concerns about block fees, so could speak about that issue and expand on other aspects of block fees?