Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 5 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1113 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Professor Alexis Jay and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs

Meeting date: 17 December 2025

Jackie Dunbar

Thank you.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Cross-portfolio Session

Meeting date: 17 December 2025

Jackie Dunbar

Cabinet secretary, did you say that the funding for the bairns’ hoose programme comes from three portfolios—health, justice and education—because child protection falls across those three portfolios?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Professor Alexis Jay and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs

Meeting date: 17 December 2025

Jackie Dunbar

As we are talking about accuracy, I note that I am one of the MSPs who, after the vote, were named on social media by the Conservatives, who said that we had voted against a grooming gangs inquiry. That led to the MSPs who were named receiving a considerable amount of abuse online, and it also had serious consequences for others.

Has the issue become too politicised? Have we moved away from what we should be concentrating on, which is how we tackle child sexual abuse and protect children from harm?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Professor Alexis Jay and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs

Meeting date: 17 December 2025

Jackie Dunbar

What do you see as the strategic group’s purpose moving forward? You said that there will be sub-groups—will there be a main group and then sub-groups in which the work is undertaken, depending on folks’ specialties? Is that how you envision it?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 December 2025

Jackie Dunbar

My understanding is that the term “work-based learning” is intended to cover all types of activities currently undertaken as foundation apprenticeships. However, the definition of work-based learning in the bill would not cover all foundation apprenticeships. Only Scottish credit and qualifications framework level 6 includes learning in a working environment, which is a key aspect of the definition in the bill, whereas levels 4 and 5 are limited to experiences such as challenge projects, based on a scenario from the employer but conducted in a school or college.

The SFC already has powers to fund learning in a college environment, but it has no powers to fund education or training in schools, and it is intended that all current foundation apprenticeships, including school based, will be secured by the SFC. To ensure a smooth transition on day 1, my amendments 9 and 10 would ensure that the SFC can fund work-based learning in schools in the same way as SDS does now. For that reason, I hope that members will support them. I have spoken to the Food and Drink Federation Scotland, which supports my two amendments. I believe that Universities Scotland has written to you, minister, asking for clarity on whether you envisage that my amendments would include graduate apprenticeships or whether that would have to be addressed at stage 3.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Jackie Dunbar

I add my thanks to the Donaldson Trust for facilitating our visit on Monday. I found the visit to be very informative. I give a special thanks to the amazing young people who spoke to me—they were brilliant.

The Scottish Government’s current non-statutory guidance was published just last November. At the evidence session that we recently had with the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, she said that the Scottish Government plans to review the impact that the guidance has had. Given that we do not know how effective the current guidance is, because it has not yet had a review, is the timing of the bill appropriate? I realise that we are getting short on time until the end of the parliamentary session, but do you think that it is right to introduce the bill now?

09:45  

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Jackie Dunbar

Thank you.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Jackie Dunbar

You scared me a bit there, Mr Johnson—I wondered what you were going to come away with.

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 12 November 2025

Jackie Dunbar

I understand what you are saying, but will we get everything right in the bill if the guidance has not yet been reviewed?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Jackie Dunbar

I thank the member for taking my intervention.

I am following this part of the discussion very closely. You said that, if care homes and hospices were not allowed to opt out, that would prevent them from taking people in. Would this not also apply to people that they want to employ as members of their team? It would have the opposite effect. If a care home opted out and said that it was not willing to participate, that could mean that anybody it wanted to employ would have to have the same opinion. My father was in a care home, and it would have caused me great concern that his care home would not be fully staffed in the future. Are you saying that if there was no opt-in or opt-out, that would not be the case? I feel a bit conflicted.