The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 652 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The seafood sector also includes the aquaculture industry, but it feels like aquaculture has been left off the list.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Section 28 of the bill sets out changes to the 1996 act in relation to the register of authorised persons. Those provisions will require some deer management practitioners, such as non-certified stalkers, to make changes—in effect, the provisions mandate training. Some in the deer sector have expressed concern that the transition to mandatory training could result in a reduction in the number of deer stalkers. For example, older farmers might decide to stop deer management. The Scottish Government has stated that it is engaging with stakeholders and will continue to do so when creating the secondary legislation on the detail of the training scheme. My intention with amendment 249 is to ensure that there is a commitment to the transitional timeframe and that support for the transition is set out in the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
It is about whether the derogation would lead to general herd reduction and people having smaller herds, and the cumulative effect of multiple herds being reduced.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
In its response, Shetland Islands Council welcomed the derogation for small herds but flagged up its concern that the limit of 10 calves would lead to a general herd reduction in the islands, which would obviously have an on-going impact on the wider supply chain. I also note that an impact assessment was done. Can you expand on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Part 2 of the bill introduces a new regulatory power relating to nature restoration. Without a non-regression clause, there is a risk that regulations could be weakened by future Governments, standards could be lowered through secondary legislation and the overall environmental protection regime could become less robust over time. That is particularly important because, although nature targets are long term, regulations might change more frequently.
My amendment 196 seeks to address that by ensuring that any regulations that are made under part 2 can only maintain or improve existing environmental standards. That non-regression safeguard ensures continuity and prevents backsliding at the implementation stage.
I note that other members have also lodged non-regression amendments. That reflects the concerns that others have alluded to and the need for such amendments. My amendment uses the phrase “maintain or improve”, which reflects the standard that is used in other major environmental statutes and provides a clear, legally recognisable threshold.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Did the impact assessment come out with that information?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
You mentioned Orkney. Could you expand on what arrangements you have come to with people on the islands?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
The SRUC pointed out that the changes will be felt differently in different parts of Scotland. Orkney and Shetland are two separate groups of islands. I notice that Shetland Islands Council raised concerns about a lack of regard for the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018. Could you address those points?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Beatrice Wishart
Part 2 of the bill introduces a new regulatory power relating to nature restoration. Without a non-regression clause, there is a risk that regulations could be weakened by future Governments, standards could be lowered through secondary legislation and the overall environmental protection regime could become less robust over time. That is particularly important because, although nature targets are long term, regulations might change more frequently.
My amendment 196 seeks to address that by ensuring that any regulations that are made under part 2 can only maintain or improve existing environmental standards. That non-regression safeguard ensures continuity and prevents backsliding at the implementation stage.
I note that other members have also lodged non-regression amendments. That reflects the concerns that others have alluded to and the need for such amendments. My amendment uses the phrase “maintain or improve”, which reflects the standard that is used in other major environmental statutes and provides a clear, legally recognisable threshold.