The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 631 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Beatrice Wishart
I will speak to amendments 29, 31 to 33 and 37. Amendment 37 seeks to remove section 10, which would have prohibited transfers of owner-occupier crofts to non-natural persons. That would have prevented, for example, community landlords from purchasing an owner-occupier croft and then reletting it or selling it to a new entrant or another crofter. My other amendments in the group will ensure that, although a non-natural person can hold title to a croft, they cannot acquire owner-occupier status.
Amendment 29 modifies section 19B of the 1993 act, which defines who can be an owner-occupier crofter. The first condition of owner-occupier status is that a person who becomes the owner after the relevant date—the date on which this part of the bill comes into force—must be an individual, meaning a natural person.
Amendments 31, 32 and 33 make further consequential changes to section 19B of the 1993 act to ensure that, if the croft is sold on to a natural person, it can once again be an owner-occupier croft. Of course, if it is let to a natural person, it will simply become a tenanted croft. Amendment 31 would ensure that, if a non-natural person buys a croft after the relevant date, an individual who later buys it from them can still meet the second condition for owner-occupier status. That applies as long as the non-natural person bought the croft from either an owner-occupier or from the constituting landlord. That status would also pass to the individual’s successors in title.
Amendment 32 makes it clear that, for a person to acquire owner-occupier status in those circumstances, the croft must not have been let to any crofter since it was acquired by the non-natural person. Amendment 33 will ensure that the definition of owner applies to the first and second conditions for owner-occupier crofter status in section 19B of the 1993 act.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Beatrice Wishart
My amendment 168 would allow a crofter to fulfil their duties under section 5C(2) of the Crofters (Scotland) Act 1993, as amended by section 1 of the bill, with the assistance of family or hired labour. The current law lacks certainty with regard to the involvement of other family members or hired labour, following the removal of the explicit wording in that regard from schedule 2 to the 1993 act, and the Law Society of Scotland has suggested that amendment 168 would provide certainty by inserting such language into the 1993 act.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Beatrice Wishart
I will speak to amendment 86. Section 24 of the bill introduces a right for croft landlords to comment on a croft registration application before it is submitted to the commission. It is intended that that voluntary process will support greater accuracy in the croft maps that are submitted for registration. Amendment 86 would extend the period for the landlord to comment from 14 days to 21 days, which would provide a more realistic timeframe for a review of the application.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
Good morning. My question is about the uptake of low-carbon measures. We heard at the evidence session a couple of weeks ago that there does not seem to be a clear idea of mitigation measures that would be implemented on farms and crofts to reduce emissions. The witness from the Scottish Agricultural Organisation Society highlighted that a list of mitigation measures is missing. Will you explain why there is not a list of mitigation measures in the draft CCP?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
People will be left in the dark if they do not know what is being sought, which direction the measures are going in and how to start implementing them.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
I have a question around the science, for those who are best able to answer it. What could we expect from another three years of monitoring? Perhaps Professor Heath might answer that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
We have already heard, in discussing the science, views on whether the proposed three-year period for the SSI is justified. What adaptive review mechanisms could be included in that period? Does reinstating exemptions risk undermining the conservation intent of the closure? Could tailored, controlled exemptions achieve a more balanced outcome?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
Will there be a list available in the final CCP?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
I just wonder whether, in three years’ time, we will be sitting here, asking the same questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Beatrice Wishart
Rhoda Grant rightly mentioned Scotland’s world-class science, but the committee has heard from stakeholders that reductions in the marine science budget have reduced capacity and damaged the marine directorate’s international reputation. Given the real-terms reduction of £1.7 million in the budget, how can we improve the situation?