The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2848 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
Good morning, and welcome to the 11th meeting in 2026 of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. I have received apologies for today’s meeting from Paul Sweeney.
Our first agenda item is to decide whether to take agenda items 4, 5 and 6 in private. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
Although I accept that those are important questions, I believe that one of your colleagues will raise them with the relevant minister in a topical question this afternoon. However, the minister who is sitting in front of the committee is here to speak to the LCM, which is quite limited in its scope. I therefore ask the minister to make some brief comments, if she can. If they relate to the LCM, that would be more appropriate.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
The next item is an evidence session with the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health and supporting officials on the Tobacco and Vapes Bill supplementary legislative consent memorandum, LCM-S6-51b, which was lodged in the Scottish Parliament by the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care on 27 February 2026.
The legislative consent process set out in chapter 9B of standing orders requires the Scottish Government to notify the Parliament, by means of a legislative consent memorandum, whenever a UK Parliament bill includes provision on devolved matters. Each LCM is referred to a lead committee to scrutinise and report on, before the Parliament decides whether to give its consent to the UK Parliament legislating in the manner proposed.
The Tobacco and Vapes Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 5 November 2024. The purpose of the bill is to introduce a series of measures that are described as a
“significant step in creating a smoke-free UK.”
The committee has previously undertaken scrutiny of an LCM and a supplementary LCM related to the bill, and published a concluding report on that scrutiny in May last year.
On 17 February 2026, further amendments to the Tobacco and Vapes Bill were tabled in the UK Parliament that extend to Scotland, triggering the need for an additional supplementary LCM.
LCM‑S6‑51b sets out the Scottish Government’s view that amendments grouped into four categories require the consent of the Scottish Parliament. This is because they relate to a purpose within the Parliament’s legislative competence—namely public health—and because some of the amendments also alter the executive competence of the Scottish ministers. These are: various amendments that relate to filters; an amendment that relates to advertising for public health; amendments that relate to technology in devices; and an amendment that relates to liability for internet service providers.
I welcome to the committee Jenni Minto, the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health; and, from the Scottish Government, Professor Linda Bauld OBE, chief social policy adviser; Fiona Dill, team leader for tobacco and nicotine; and Katherine McGarvey, lawyer.
I invite the minister to make a brief opening statement.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
Thank you, minister. We now move to questions from Sandesh Gulhane
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
Your questioning is straying quite far from the limits of the LCM. Is your question in relation to the LCM that the minister is here to speak to?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
Sandesh, do you have any further questions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
On the theme of national strategy and public health priorities, I note that priority 3 in the “Public Health Priorities for Scotland” is to have a
“Scotland where we have good mental wellbeing”.
However, when I look at the strategy document, I can see only one reference to mental illness or mental ill health. How will you promote the mental wellbeing of Scotland’s population if you do not refer to that in your priority document?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
Time is running away from us, so I ask members to keep their questions short and our witnesses to be succinct in their answers.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
The Scottish national audit programme—SNAP—is run by Public Health Scotland. How many audits are carried out into treatment for mental illness?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Clare Haughey
The vision for SNAP is
“to provide an internationally recognised health intelligence service which, by working in partnership with stakeholders to audit clinical care, plays a key role in promoting safe, effective and person-centred healthcare in Scotland.”
How does that vision align with the decision to step back from the Scottish electroconvulsive therapy audit network, more commonly known as SEAN?