The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1402 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
Good morning. When it comes to making difficult policy choices in the very tight fiscal circumstances that we all face, do you agree that the emphasis should be on the policies that deliver the best outcomes and that there should be less emphasis on the policies that do not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
I do not doubt that, cabinet secretary. I am sure that it is a difficult job, particularly just now. However, the Scottish Fiscal Commission—which is clearly being very diplomatic about this, as it usually is—is not confident that some of the statistics that the Scottish Government has presented to it match up with its own analysis. Mairi Spowage told us that, when it came to college funding, she was not at all clear about where the specific lines were in that portfolio. We had David Bell saying that he was “completely confused” about how the fiscal sustainability delivery plan closes the fiscal gap. Is it not an embarrassment to the Scottish Government that there are experts in their field who do not feel that there is sufficient transparency in the Scottish budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
I am just putting it to you that, despite what you say about the ABR and so on, our experts who are scrutinising the budget are being very clear in all their comments. It is not just one person saying this; our senior economic analysts are all saying the same thing—that, as we scrutinise the budget, there is confusion over where the budget spend is and, therefore, over where the best results are. Also, let us be honest, cabinet secretary: your budget speech had to have two corrections made to it, which were welcome and made quickly. There was an issue about the A96 and an issue about the provision for school swimming.
The on-going lack of transparency makes it difficult not only for the committee but for the public to understand which lines of spending will best deliver the results that the Government is seeking to achieve.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
I am interested in that because, as you will recall, in paragraph 73 of this committee’s report on the budget we expressed our disappointment that there was not more detail about this very issue, particularly when it came to measuring the value of universal payments. In replying to that criticism, the Government said:
“the Scottish Government is developing its approach to public value”,
which
“will embed a framework for understanding spending proposals”.
That was the Scottish Government’s response.
This time last week, I asked Professor Graeme Roy whether he was aware of what that framework was. He said:
“I am not aware of it.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 20 January 2026; c 25.]
Can you provide us with some detail on what that framework is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
I am interested in the Scottish one. Let us not forget that the Scottish Fiscal Commission has had to come up with some of its own figures in contrast to what the Scottish Government has been saying. The Scottish Government has said that there is a 6.6 per cent real-terms increase in the education budget, but the Scottish Fiscal Commission has said that it is a 0.8 per cent real-terms increase. The Scottish Government has said that there is an 8.9 per cent real-terms increase in the housing budget, but the Scottish Fiscal Commission has said that it is a 3.9 per cent real-terms increase.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
You will be starring in it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
During the past two years, you have very successfully worked to simplify the explanation of the budget through blogs, better diagrams and so on. Have you had a good response to that? Is there positive feedback that it is helping?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
Will that continue? In the autumn, when the Parliament in the new session is embedded, there will be more training on the budget. Will that be extended to parliamentary staff as well as to new MSPs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
But given that there is concern—which this committee has expressed not just this year but for several years now—that it is absolutely critical to have transparency in times of difficult circumstances, is it not something that the Government would choose to provide more detail on than we currently have?
The Scottish Fiscal Commission made the point that, if you compare the current Scottish spending review to what was produced in the 2011 spending review, we are not getting nearly enough of the budget line 3 spending requirements. It is therefore very difficult for us, as a committee that is supposed to be scrutinising the finances of the country, to know exactly where the most productive policy engagement is and where the Government would be perfectly in order to deprioritise, because the outcome is not so good. Is that not fundamental to the process of budget making?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
Never mind the measures in the budget; overall, considerable concern has been expressed about how the Scottish Government delivered it, and there has also been the analysis of our experts.