The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 544 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
Yes—it is a fantastic space; I enjoyed lecturing there just a few months ago. It is very modern inside.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
I think that we all want to avoid the type of situation that we see today, walking down Princes Street, in which a lot of our heritage has been destroyed because the council of the day wanted progress. The same happened with the royal arch in Dundee, which has sadly been lost.
A specific example, which leads on to my question, is Castleroy house in Broughty Ferry in Dundee. It was built by one of the jute barons in 1867 and had 100 rooms and 365 windows—one for every day of the year. Sadly, after world war two, it was demolished—those involved did not try to recover very much, but if you visit Dundee, you can see the gatehouse, which is still standing and is usefully deployed for housing.
The issue with Castleroy house was that it was allowed to deteriorate. Are there any early interventions that could be deployed in such cases? If there are, who would do that, and how would it work?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
It might be helpful to set out the context for all that before we actually look at the petition. I want to clarify one point. Tess White said that the consultation was disgraceful, but Douglas Lumsden suggested that the relevant organisations were undertaking pre-application consultation anyway, which would be good practice. Was Mr Lumsden referring to other organisations? If an organisation is undertaking good practice, that would strike me as not being disgraceful—does that make sense?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
Okay, sorry.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
Quite. With regard to the context for all this, all Scottish Conservatives, in the 2021 manifesto, wanted to showcase Scotland as world leading in tackling climate change, so candidates were very much standing on the agenda of tackling the issue of net zero and being ambitious in doing so.
I appreciate that communities are up in arms regarding the infrastructure. There was a very simple way in which we could have avoided building the infrastructure, and that was by not building the generation at a point where we need to transmit electricity via said infrastructure. That happened under 14 years of UK Conservative Government.
There are ways to unpick that, but it is much more difficult, with regard to the context of the petition, to do it from this point. Nevertheless, there are possible follow-ups with regard to the Scottish Government aspect, which is only a part of the entire project. One would be to ask the Scottish Government what action it will take, now that the consultation on reforming consenting processes in Scotland has closed, specifically with regard to implementing the proposal for a statutory pre-application community engagement process, and what mechanisms it will put in place to strengthen community participation for the life cycle of energy infrastructure projects beyond the pre-application stage.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
I agree. Members of the public would think that it is outrageous that people are living in damp or mouldy conditions. It is a sad reflection of things that a petition needed to be lodged for this committee’s consideration. I am loth to close the petition until stage 3 of the Housing (Scotland) Bill is complete and we have seen what provisions acquiesce to the petition’s aims.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
Perhaps I can ask Laura Shanks to follow on from Hazel Johnson’s point. There is the initial question of early intervention, but, in addition to that, how consistent is the approach of local authorities to the area more generally?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
We often hear that planning departments in local authorities are struggling with staff recruitment and retention. What is the picture with regard to building standards?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
I agree with Mr Torrance, but I put on the record that NHS 24 staff who use Greenmarket car park in Dundee have been in touch with me to say that they are paying up to £100 per month to park there in the course of their duties. I appreciate that the vast majority of healthcare staff are covered, as has been outlined, but I wanted to put that on the record.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Maurice Golden
As someone who started school at four and got accepted to the University of Dundee at 16, I am a big fan of flexibility. However, given the explanations that we have heard and on the basis that, as you have highlighted, local authorities have the flexibility to determine school commencement dates, I think that we should close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders. Parents are key to the matter and have a long-standing legal right to defer the school’s starting date for their child, particularly when they feel that more time in early years and childcare settings would be more appropriate. Finally, meeting the needs of different learners in the single-class cohort is already built into the principles and practices of curriculum design under the curriculum for excellence framework.