The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2416 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
I think that you would agree that it is important for us to have absolute clarity on the figures that we are looking at. Exhibit 1, on page 8 of the Auditor General’s report, refers to “Domestic transport”. When I read that, I immediately leapt to the conclusion that it meant cars. Of course, it does not—it refers to the territorial area of Scotland being domestic as opposed to international, although some of the categories listed in that chart are also domestic.
It was not until we queried that and got a breakdown that we found out that, while cars are, in fact, still a significant proportion of it, there are also trucks, buses and railways, and goodness knows what else. That could be clearer, because I think that a lot of people would jump, as I did, to thinking that domestic transport means just cars, when it clearly does not.
That is not a question—it is just an observation to think about.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
The Auditor General’s report identifies a number of shortfalls in the active travel grant funding. What lessons have been learned from that about how to handle that issue, and what measures are in place to identify those issues?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
Okay. We will rely on your assurance that you are improving things.
Cabinet secretary, you mentioned the problems with one-year funding for active travel and public transport schemes. How are you planning to address the challenge of providing reassurance to partners who are working with you on what are long-term, multiyear projects? Given the one-year funding model, how can you reassure them that those projects are secure?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
To pick up on what you say about the data, one of the recurring themes in evidence to the committee in the past has been that the data is not always consistent. It is not always produced by councils in the same way, and so compatibility becomes a problem and you do not get the results that you want. Are you satisfied that there will be consistency in the data?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
Coming back to the Auditor General, surely, when the audit was taking place, questions would have been asked and someone would have been able to answer them. There is no evidence of that in the report.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
The Auditor General does not refer to any potential fraud or irregularities. However, I would have thought that, if he had been aware that there was some documentation to back up what was said about the spending, he would not have been quite so stark in what he said.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
The only thing that I would say in response to that is that the Auditor General’s report says, at paragraph 56:
“Transport Scotland did not check any documentary evidence that the £82.5 million had been spent on projects before authorising payments.”
That does not support your statement that there was documentation. Obviously, the Auditor General did not see that documentation.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
Cabinet secretary, can I start with a wee moan?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
Looking at the Auditor General’s report, there appears to be a shortage of data on outcomes from some of the investments that are being made. How do you manage to inform the budget when the outcomes from what has already been spent are not clear?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Colin Beattie
Yes, of course.