The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 952 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
We could debate the figures all day. Figures from SPICe show that the 2025-26 capital budget for Scottish Enterprise was £90.1 million, whereas it is £89.5 million in the budget that has just been presented. That is a reduction, not an increase.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
We will let the Scottish Government and SPICe fight it out.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
We do not have to leave the window open.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
I would like to get a clarification on the record from the minister. It is my understanding, from looking at the instrument and the background proposals, that the instrument will have no impact on UK service providers but will apply only to those that are overseas and seek to trade in the UK. Could the minister clarify that on the record?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
I just saw him break out in a cold sweat.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
Amendments 17 and 20 in the group are in my name. Amendment 17 deals with the question of targets in community wealth building plans for public procurement spend with local economic operators. The issue was raised with the committee by a number of witnesses who gave evidence at stage 1—most notably, the Federation of Small Businesses, which is particularly keen that community wealth building is used a means of supporting the local business community.
In line with my general approach to the bill, which I do not want to be cluttered with lots of provisions, amendment 17 is intended to be relatively light in touch. It does not specify what the target should be. It would be for the local organisation that prepares the plan—for example, the local authority—to set the target. That target might indeed be zero—which would not, of course, be helpful—but the intention is to put something in the bill to require the setting of a target, therefore encouraging more public money to be spent on supporting local communities.
Convener, I notice that your amendment 27 is similar in approach. I prefer my approach because it is lighter in touch than yours, which is overly prescriptive. We are in the same general territory but amendment 17 is neater and cleaner and imposes fewer obligations on the organisations that prepare community wealth building plans. I therefore commend amendment 17 to colleagues as it allows maximum local flexibility, as I have outlined.
Amendment 20 is consequential in essence and seeks to require reporting on the matter. Every community wealth building partnership would, at the end of every financial year, have to prepare a report setting out the percentage of total spend on public procurement contracts with local economic operators, and publish that, so that it was transparent.
I move amendment 17.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
Okay. I will ask about VisitScotland. According to table 9.14 in the budget document, the tourism spend is down from £55.8 million, after the autumn budget revision, to £52.2 million. I am sure that you will agree that tourism is a vital driver for the Scottish economy. Tourism businesses are really struggling at the moment, due to rising cost pressures—not least, rates revaluation. Why has the spend on tourism gone down?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
It is going to be busy, so you are going to cut the budget that attracts people to Scotland—is that it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
I have one more question. We have mentioned tourism. If you are anything like me, your inbox will be full of concerns from hospitality and self-catering businesses about the rates revaluation. People are extremely concerned about the impact that that will have on the viability of their businesses, should the proposed rateable values be solidified. Some will see two, three, or four-fold increases and will not be able to survive. There was disappointment that the announcements about reliefs and rate poundage in last week’s budget would help some but would go nowhere near to addressing those concerns. What more can the Scottish Government do to address that serious issue?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
I have a follow-up question. Do you accept that there are legitimate issues with the methodology that is being applied to a sector such as self-catering, where, in the view of many people, the assessors are not accurately reflecting the way in which the sector operates and its profitability? Do you agree that that must be addressed? I understand that the assessors are independent, but the framework under which they operate is set by legislation.