The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 710 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
That brings me back to the previous crofting legislation. Prior to the Crofting Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, the commission used to have a crofting development role, which was taken off it and passed to HIE. It seems to me that the people Donna Smith was talking about, out on the ground, were not only looking to see what was right and wrong; they were also advising people, working with communities and pointing them in the right direction for developing and growing their business. There was an education role as well as a development role.
When that role was taken away, I thought that it was perhaps a backward step. Should that role be resurrected for the commission to do? The commission is closer to the crofting communities. Sandra Holmes is here from HIE, and it would be interesting to hear from her, given her experience as a crofter, her experience in HIE and her knowledge of what the commission used to do. I am putting Sandra on the spot, which is perhaps not very fair, given that she is employed by HIE.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
We know that there are issues with common grazings where the grazing share has come adrift from the croft. The bill tries to deal with that, but does it do so properly or does it need to go further?
The other issue is the use of common grazings. We have touched on use for environmental purposes, for example, but we have not really talked about who owns the carbon rights on common grazings. I am keen to get your views on whether the bill deals with issues around common grazings or whether it needs a lot more amendments. Donna Smith is smiling, so we will start with her.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Is there an issue with diversification and the fact that people are growing vegetables or whatever in that they are moving away from having animals and are not using their common grazing share?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Crofting is for agricultural use and sustainability. Some time ago, we heard from a group of crofters and smallholders that many of them had already reached net zero and were sequestering carbon. Should environmental use be linked to agricultural use, so that you cannot just say that you are rewilding a piece of land and walk away—you would need to have agricultural production that is environmentally friendly? Would that be a different way of looking at it? Are we missing something about how we could protect nature through crofting?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay, but the bill’s provisions will fall outwith the UNCRC, because the bill is amending legislation from 1980.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Are there examples of the 1998 act exemption having been used?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Following on from that, I note that some witnesses have told us that part 1 of the bill is not compatible with the UNCRC, because it amends the 1980 act. Is the bill compatible?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Yes—of course it is about being compatible.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
Given what you have said before, cabinet secretary, about the complexity of all this legislation, should you have been considering a consolidation bill to bring the legislation into the scope of the UNCRC, rather than an amending act?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Rhoda Grant
But such an exemption has never been used.